Ah yes the 'it's just a small piece' argument, as if that's any justification for mutilating a child without their consent, that's all you guys have.
So if someone is born intersex with a small nodule of a nonfunctional penis above an functional vagina, we should force them to keep it to adulthood? Or is it only okay in that sense but doing an even more minor surgery that has proven lifelong health incentives is “mutilation”?
Coming from people whose arguments are exact copy pastes of the people pushing troon surgeries this is just delightful.
It’s gaslighting to show centuries of medical studies…
Coming from the side of “removing a small piece of epithelial tissue is the same as cutting of the entire penis”
So if someone is born intersex with a small nodule of a nonfunctional penis above an functional vagina, we should force them to keep it to adulthood? Or is it only okay in that sense but doing an even more minor surgery that has proven lifelong health incentives is “mutilation”?
everyone block this paid shill