Ah yes the 'it's just a small piece' argument, as if that's any justification for mutilating a child without their consent, that's all you guys have.
So if someone is born intersex with a small nodule of a nonfunctional penis above an functional vagina, we should force them to keep it to adulthood? Or is it only okay in that sense but doing an even more minor surgery that has proven lifelong health incentives is “mutilation”?
“I don’t have an answer so I’m going to repeat the same line”. It’s not a ridiculous example it’s a direct comparison, both are completely benign surgeries with no long term complications, in fact there’s proven health benefits to circumcision over removing a non functional penis nodule. Please go on though!
So if someone is born intersex with a small nodule of a nonfunctional penis above an functional vagina, we should force them to keep it to adulthood? Or is it only okay in that sense but doing an even more minor surgery that has proven lifelong health incentives is “mutilation”?
“I don’t have an answer so I’m going to repeat the same line”. It’s not a ridiculous example it’s a direct comparison, both are completely benign surgeries with no long term complications, in fact there’s proven health benefits to circumcision over removing a non functional penis nodule. Please go on though!
That’s adorable! Tell you what, when you can prove the repeated studies over decades that show better health in circumcised men were wrong we’ll talk.
Yes it’s called being able to back up my argument, unlike you.
Saying it should be up to the parent’s discretion and there’s a legitimate medical purpose= gaslighting. This is just libtard levels of coping