You guys remember when the Democrat brand was all about helping the poor and shit? Now all they care about is tax cuts for the rich (SALT), welfare for the rich (free childcare), and bailouts for the rich.
Democrats hate the poor now because a bunch of poor people voted for Trump.
They don’t hate poor people. They hate white people. No democrat sees a middle class black family and thinks “that needs to change”. Democrats will, however, point to a white middle class family and call them problematic.
You cannot resolve or reconcile the hypocrisies, double standards, and contradictions of leftism without acknowledging anti-white racism.
Democrats hate the poor now because a bunch of poor people voted for Trump.
It's insane how open they are about it. They love to trot out that the 'college educated vote Dem' and 'high school rubes vote Orange Man,' and how much smarter and better their lib side is. Either without realizing or without caring that that's more "classist" than anything the right does.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the $250,000 FDIC insurance is per Bank, correct so if you had $500,000, you would simply divide it evenly among two FDIC insured accounts at two different banks and all of it would be insured. This is on the depositors if they dumped all their money in one bank knowing that only that portion of it was insured.
Democrats love spending other people's money.
You guys remember when the Democrat brand was all about helping the poor and shit? Now all they care about is tax cuts for the rich (SALT), welfare for the rich (free childcare), and bailouts for the rich.
Democrats hate the poor now because a bunch of poor people voted for Trump.
They don’t hate poor people. They hate white people. No democrat sees a middle class black family and thinks “that needs to change”. Democrats will, however, point to a white middle class family and call them problematic.
You cannot resolve or reconcile the hypocrisies, double standards, and contradictions of leftism without acknowledging anti-white racism.
It's insane how open they are about it. They love to trot out that the 'college educated vote Dem' and 'high school rubes vote Orange Man,' and how much smarter and better their lib side is. Either without realizing or without caring that that's more "classist" than anything the right does.
There's going to be a bank run of bank runs, isn't there?
Why is commiefornia so full of perverts even the names are degenerate?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the $250,000 FDIC insurance is per Bank, correct so if you had $500,000, you would simply divide it evenly among two FDIC insured accounts at two different banks and all of it would be insured. This is on the depositors if they dumped all their money in one bank knowing that only that portion of it was insured.
No, doing that will raise suspicion that the banks are on the brink and cause a bank run, which will cause more collapses.
Draw a line under the three banks that collapsed and leave it there. That's the best way to move forward.
The financial sector is very fickle. It only works if you believe in it wholeheartedly.
....there's something missing from your comment. Something just feels off.
How so?
no mentioning of evil women that run these banks
I could mention the risk chair of SVB, who was a woman previously responsible for the near-collapse of Deutsche Bank in 2008.
no please don't
Or the female chair of the SF Fed who was in charge of monitoring the finances of SVB, who was almost criminally negligent in allowing this situation.
That almost sounds like the financial system we have is the emperor from WH40k.