Teenage, as a category, is pretty incoherent. It contains: prepubescent children with no legal privileges, adolescents who can legally operate motor vehicles, and fully developed adults who can vote and serve in the military. Including all of these demos in one category is reductive and stupid.
except the implication is pedophilia. while i'm not in a rush to bang an 18 year old, it is legal, and if she's going to have consensual sex anyone who denies her that is a woman hating misogynistic woman hater nazi bigot.
there are a shitload of 30something and 40something harpies pissed off about men dating younger women... that's their own fault for being undesirable.
I understand the implication. My point is that the implication is only possible because the category is stupidly broad. There are at least three distinct age groups described as teenage. An adult male engaging in sex with a “teenager” faces punishment ranging from 20+ years in prison to literally nothing at all.
Don't forget: we have people now saying women aged above 18 but below 21 are still children and cannot consent or are never at fault for anything, they call women like this literal children still. Infantilisation is real.
Teenage, as a category, is pretty incoherent. It contains: prepubescent children with no legal privileges, adolescents who can legally operate motor vehicles, and fully developed adults who can vote and serve in the military. Including all of these demos in one category is reductive and stupid.
except the implication is pedophilia. while i'm not in a rush to bang an 18 year old, it is legal, and if she's going to have consensual sex anyone who denies her that is a woman hating misogynistic woman hater nazi bigot.
there are a shitload of 30something and 40something harpies pissed off about men dating younger women... that's their own fault for being undesirable.
Which by definition can only include the first group of prepubescent children.
Yet the same people happy to let trannies fuck your children for "Progress" have expanded pedophilia to apply to any woman under 27 years old.
I understand the implication. My point is that the implication is only possible because the category is stupidly broad. There are at least three distinct age groups described as teenage. An adult male engaging in sex with a “teenager” faces punishment ranging from 20+ years in prison to literally nothing at all.
Don't forget: we have people now saying women aged above 18 but below 21 are still children and cannot consent or are never at fault for anything, they call women like this literal children still. Infantilisation is real.
They've gone to claiming 25 so you're behind the times
WTF, now it's 25?! Responsibility for women now got thrown out the window I guess.