except the implication is pedophilia. while i'm not in a rush to bang an 18 year old, it is legal, and if she's going to have consensual sex anyone who denies her that is a woman hating misogynistic woman hater nazi bigot.
there are a shitload of 30something and 40something harpies pissed off about men dating younger women... that's their own fault for being undesirable.
I understand the implication. My point is that the implication is only possible because the category is stupidly broad. There are at least three distinct age groups described as teenage. An adult male engaging in sex with a “teenager” faces punishment ranging from 20+ years in prison to literally nothing at all.
except the implication is pedophilia. while i'm not in a rush to bang an 18 year old, it is legal, and if she's going to have consensual sex anyone who denies her that is a woman hating misogynistic woman hater nazi bigot.
there are a shitload of 30something and 40something harpies pissed off about men dating younger women... that's their own fault for being undesirable.
Which by definition can only include the first group of prepubescent children.
Yet the same people happy to let trannies fuck your children for "Progress" have expanded pedophilia to apply to any woman under 27 years old.
I understand the implication. My point is that the implication is only possible because the category is stupidly broad. There are at least three distinct age groups described as teenage. An adult male engaging in sex with a “teenager” faces punishment ranging from 20+ years in prison to literally nothing at all.