Elliott's publisher told him privately they believed he and others on the list were innocent but publicly supported it anyway? This shit is ghastly.
Is there anything even remotely as damaging to the reputation of women as false accusations are for men? I don't think so, but I could be wrong. Even with proven female pedophiles, lots of people will comment "nice" or say the victim was a "lucky guy."
Elliott's publisher told him privately they believed he and others on the list were innocent but publicly supported it anyway? This shit is ghastly.
It's kind of expected. Women use intimidation tactics to silence victims. A non-profit, I'm guessing, gets by on donations. They can't afford the reputational damage women can inflict.
You have to be really strong or really rich to take this fight and get close to a win.
Is there anything even remotely as damaging to the reputation of women as false accusations are for men?
There you go with that "we" concept again. Nobody is on your side in this anymore because you inevitably go down yet another purity spiral and attack men in the end for any perceived connection that might exist with women. There's also the repeated anti-natalist hill you keep deciding to die on which puts you at odds with pretty much all of human history.
You are in this alone and, going by your own admissions, you are going to die alone with nobody to inherit from you other than the State where they will sell whatever assets you once owned, or just burn them, and then give that money to who they choose rather than whatever choices you could have made.
yet another purity spiral and attack men in the end for any perceived connection that might exist with women
The irony being that this is a very distinctly female trait, that the feminists have used for years to keep men under their heel by promoting the idea of being in a constant cycle of accidental sinning and then needing to repent by being a "better ally" and becoming more of a sniveling cuck. A life of paranoia that any wrong word instantly puts you in the bad category.
Its almost funny how the most perfected feminist positions himself as believing to be their opposite.
Footfags are cancer and some of the dumbest people out there given how low effort [we're talking subterranean] feet pics are and how easily such pics can be used to catfish with.
Elliott's publisher told him privately they believed he and others on the list were innocent but publicly supported it anyway? This shit is ghastly.
Is there anything even remotely as damaging to the reputation of women as false accusations are for men? I don't think so, but I could be wrong. Even with proven female pedophiles, lots of people will comment "nice" or say the victim was a "lucky guy."
It's kind of expected. Women use intimidation tactics to silence victims. A non-profit, I'm guessing, gets by on donations. They can't afford the reputational damage women can inflict.
You have to be really strong or really rich to take this fight and get close to a win.
I don't think so, honestly. Murdering a girl?
Only if you get caught, and aren't (D) black.
Any man who allies with feminists and supports false allegations against another man deserves to be __________.
Married to them.
There you go with that "we" concept again. Nobody is on your side in this anymore because you inevitably go down yet another purity spiral and attack men in the end for any perceived connection that might exist with women. There's also the repeated anti-natalist hill you keep deciding to die on which puts you at odds with pretty much all of human history.
You are in this alone and, going by your own admissions, you are going to die alone with nobody to inherit from you other than the State where they will sell whatever assets you once owned, or just burn them, and then give that money to who they choose rather than whatever choices you could have made.
The irony being that this is a very distinctly female trait, that the feminists have used for years to keep men under their heel by promoting the idea of being in a constant cycle of accidental sinning and then needing to repent by being a "better ally" and becoming more of a sniveling cuck. A life of paranoia that any wrong word instantly puts you in the bad category.
Its almost funny how the most perfected feminist positions himself as believing to be their opposite.
...What? So you like "sex" with women but only if it doesn't involve penetration? What an incredibly bizarre thing to say.
Footfags prefer nonpenetrative sex. Same with those extreme wierdos who like armpits.
Footfags are cancer and some of the dumbest people out there given how low effort [we're talking subterranean] feet pics are and how easily such pics can be used to catfish with.
I don't disagree at all. Just saying that there are some real degenerates out there whose preferred method of sex isn't penetrative.
That's called sodomy, and once upon a time we had a way of dealing with these people.
Sodomy is still penetration, its just the non-natural ones.
Trouble is, you can also bankrupt yourself. Lawyers are expensive as hell, and the primary beneficiaries of civil lawsuits.