I get what you're saying, but there are unreasonable bigots out there on the extreme end. They aren't common, and really aren't enough of a problem to base policy around despite what most discourse says, but you can see them directly yourself. And to many they will take that as a problem they get emotional about, without thinking of the consequences of fixing it.
i think you may find that the people these "racist White guys" are purportedly so very bigoted against are themselves so unreasonable that it is difficult to find a solution to the problem of them that's more unreasonable than the status quo.
i'm on the more merciful end of things. i think the barbarity some people suggest, fully rightly mind you, is something we can do without. even then, however, i would not stand in their way, because the way things are going, it would be suicide to decline a solution.
either way, i'd like to hear where your line for unreasonable is exactly, we might be operating in different paradigms here.
I mean, I'm a racist white guy and I'm basing them on even myself finding that they aren't thinking logically any longer. Because that's the unreasonable part, when your hate no longer has any grounding in reality.
There is a difference between wanting blacks out because of violence and crime and then thinking that they are purposefully stealing your fat trashy girlfriends out of some grand scheme, instead of her just being a junkie who fucks for a hit. For a more obvious example around this place, there is a difference between hating women and being anti-feminist, and then whatever Impossible1 does.
But that's not really my point anyway. To most people, an angry man screaming about niggers unprompted is something that creates a seedling of an idea that racism is a problem. That seedling is a nothing on its own really beyond a random dude, but it exists at the heart of their entire narrative. J6 doesn't even have a seedling at its heart, its entirely fabricated.
I get what you're saying, but there are unreasonable bigots out there on the extreme end. They aren't common, and really aren't enough of a problem to base policy around despite what most discourse says, but you can see them directly yourself. And to many they will take that as a problem they get emotional about, without thinking of the consequences of fixing it.
i think you may find that the people these "racist White guys" are purportedly so very bigoted against are themselves so unreasonable that it is difficult to find a solution to the problem of them that's more unreasonable than the status quo.
i'm on the more merciful end of things. i think the barbarity some people suggest, fully rightly mind you, is something we can do without. even then, however, i would not stand in their way, because the way things are going, it would be suicide to decline a solution.
either way, i'd like to hear where your line for unreasonable is exactly, we might be operating in different paradigms here.
I mean, I'm a racist white guy and I'm basing them on even myself finding that they aren't thinking logically any longer. Because that's the unreasonable part, when your hate no longer has any grounding in reality.
There is a difference between wanting blacks out because of violence and crime and then thinking that they are purposefully stealing your fat trashy girlfriends out of some grand scheme, instead of her just being a junkie who fucks for a hit. For a more obvious example around this place, there is a difference between hating women and being anti-feminist, and then whatever Impossible1 does.
But that's not really my point anyway. To most people, an angry man screaming about niggers unprompted is something that creates a seedling of an idea that racism is a problem. That seedling is a nothing on its own really beyond a random dude, but it exists at the heart of their entire narrative. J6 doesn't even have a seedling at its heart, its entirely fabricated.