The counter is "good riddance". Either they're stubborn, or it's far too late for them to reverse the process, but either way they need to be removed for the sake of those around them.
At least 90% of the time they aren't actually trans, or to use the proper term: gender dysphoric. A lot of these situations in schools are a result of rapid onset gender dysphoria caused by either the teachers or their peers. when removed from the environment and left alone, most of the time these kids revert as it's just a phase.
If a kid has legit gender dysphoria, the only time when these therapies might be appropriate, It will have manifested at home long before the kid gets to school. A kid transitioning at school and trying to hide it from their parents is a huge red flag that there are bad actors and bad authority figures in their life.
Hey look that thing that never happens and you're a shitlord for thinking it was possible happened again but it's a good thing and proof it's not happening well enough.
It was only after the girl, 9, drew suicidal images that her parents found out teacher Debra Rosenquist was calling her 'Leo' and using he/him pronouns - Superintendent Jennifer J. Quinn and Terryville Road Elementary School principal Annemarie V. Sciove admitted they knew about Rosenquist's antics
But but, Libs of TikTok said that all the evil groomer teachers are men in her book! I can't believe a feminist plant valued anti-trans advocate would just lie like that.
If you teach kids that the male teacher is going to be the one grooming them, they will associate male teachers with grooming. What help would her teachings give to stop this? None.
But they're not meant to.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sticking by this hypothesis - feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers. The plan of playing the male "groomer" card is purely to maximize the power of women's open discrimination by removing the last people who aren't taking part.
I know children don't understand framing and Pavlovian conditioning, but surely a grown adult does and LOTT definitely does. It's a very deliberate choice, to join a pile-on on an already widely attacked group
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
It's got nothing to do with Ivan Pavlov either, except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman.
I hope I'm wrong
I'm sure you do.
feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers.
You're going to die of heart disease at age 40, if this is your response to the gender of a character in a book.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives. This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
If she has no ill will towards males, why did she pick a male character to represent evil teachers when the profession is 80+% female? IIRC, even JK "female murderers are victims" Rowling had a female teacher as the antagonist in Harry Potter.
except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman
Or yours to my posts.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives.
I mean, that is literally what TERFs are like. It's not up for debate.
This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
You mean...a profession that's majority female might have a woman do something bad to a girl, by sheer numbers? No way...
Hopefully this poor girl's mental state will improve, now that she's being removed from the source of the problem.
The counter is "good riddance". Either they're stubborn, or it's far too late for them to reverse the process, but either way they need to be removed for the sake of those around them.
At least 90% of the time they aren't actually trans, or to use the proper term: gender dysphoric. A lot of these situations in schools are a result of rapid onset gender dysphoria caused by either the teachers or their peers. when removed from the environment and left alone, most of the time these kids revert as it's just a phase.
If a kid has legit gender dysphoria, the only time when these therapies might be appropriate, It will have manifested at home long before the kid gets to school. A kid transitioning at school and trying to hide it from their parents is a huge red flag that there are bad actors and bad authority figures in their life.
Hey look that thing that never happens and you're a shitlord for thinking it was possible happened again but it's a good thing and proof it's not happening well enough.
Of course it's a danger haired white woman. Tranny-lites have a fetish for this.
I'm surprised none of the power queer chicks have transitioned from "woman" to "trans-trans-woman"
Ala Victor/Victoria.
fellow white
odd that this "conversion therapy" is celebrated.
A lawsuit? Oh, I don’t think so.
Munchausen's by proxy-- with other people's children!!!
But but, Libs of TikTok said that all the evil groomer teachers are men in her book! I can't believe a
feminist plantvalued anti-trans advocate would just lie like that.Where?
She's Jewish, you know, so of course she's baaaaad.
Kidding aside, can you get any more moronic?
You literally engaged with my post on it, you clown.
Here's your claim:
Here's your evidence:
I guess you accepted the challenge to be even more moronic. Let's see what you can do on the rebound.
I know children don't understand framing and Pavlovian conditioning, but surely a grown adult does and LOTT definitely does. It's a very deliberate choice, to join a pile-on on an already widely attacked group, in a field where discrimination based on gender is practically universal.
If you teach kids that the male teacher is going to be the one grooming them, they will associate male teachers with grooming. What help would her teachings give to stop this? None.
But they're not meant to.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sticking by this hypothesis - feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers. The plan of playing the male "groomer" card is purely to maximize the power of women's open discrimination by removing the last people who aren't taking part.
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
It's got nothing to do with Ivan Pavlov either, except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman.
I'm sure you do.
You're going to die of heart disease at age 40, if this is your response to the gender of a character in a book.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives. This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
If she has no ill will towards males, why did she pick a male character to represent evil teachers when the profession is 80+% female? IIRC, even JK "female murderers are victims" Rowling had a female teacher as the antagonist in Harry Potter.
Or yours to my posts.
I mean, that is literally what TERFs are like. It's not up for debate.
You mean...a profession that's majority female might have a woman do something bad to a girl, by sheer numbers? No way...
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Feminists aren't an identity group.