If you teach kids that the male teacher is going to be the one grooming them, they will associate male teachers with grooming. What help would her teachings give to stop this? None.
But they're not meant to.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sticking by this hypothesis - feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers. The plan of playing the male "groomer" card is purely to maximize the power of women's open discrimination by removing the last people who aren't taking part.
I know children don't understand framing and Pavlovian conditioning, but surely a grown adult does and LOTT definitely does. It's a very deliberate choice, to join a pile-on on an already widely attacked group
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
It's got nothing to do with Ivan Pavlov either, except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman.
I hope I'm wrong
I'm sure you do.
feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers.
You're going to die of heart disease at age 40, if this is your response to the gender of a character in a book.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives. This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
If she has no ill will towards males, why did she pick a male character to represent evil teachers when the profession is 80+% female? IIRC, even JK "female murderers are victims" Rowling had a female teacher as the antagonist in Harry Potter.
except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman
Or yours to my posts.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives.
I mean, that is literally what TERFs are like. It's not up for debate.
This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
You mean...a profession that's majority female might have a woman do something bad to a girl, by sheer numbers? No way...
Here's your claim:
Here's your evidence:
I guess you accepted the challenge to be even more moronic. Let's see what you can do on the rebound.
I know children don't understand framing and Pavlovian conditioning, but surely a grown adult does and LOTT definitely does. It's a very deliberate choice, to join a pile-on on an already widely attacked group, in a field where discrimination based on gender is practically universal.
If you teach kids that the male teacher is going to be the one grooming them, they will associate male teachers with grooming. What help would her teachings give to stop this? None.
But they're not meant to.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sticking by this hypothesis - feminist women are hoping the right will give them a stronger hold on education if they can push the blame on male teachers. The plan of playing the male "groomer" card is purely to maximize the power of women's open discrimination by removing the last people who aren't taking part.
Making a bad guy a guy is not a "pile-on". No one but your stupid ass concluded that she claimed that "every groomer is male", a claim for which you've produced no evidence, by the way.
It's got nothing to do with Ivan Pavlov either, except for your Pavlovian reaction to anything involving a woman.
I'm sure you do.
You're going to die of heart disease at age 40, if this is your response to the gender of a character in a book.
By the way, you're always claiming that the BAD WOMENS are grooming boys, and that they are "panicked" when they see girls ruin their lives. This story went against your narrative, because a female teacher groomed a girl. So you started making wild allegations against LoTT in order to distract from the fact that as always, you were wrong.
If she has no ill will towards males, why did she pick a male character to represent evil teachers when the profession is 80+% female? IIRC, even JK "female murderers are victims" Rowling had a female teacher as the antagonist in Harry Potter.
Or yours to my posts.
I mean, that is literally what TERFs are like. It's not up for debate.
You mean...a profession that's majority female might have a woman do something bad to a girl, by sheer numbers? No way...