All rhetoric typical of election years. You let me know when he signs constitutional carry and bans genital mutilation, and reduces the gun buying age back to 18.
And what changes? Oh, just Disney getting to become a corporation again, instead of having to run a government that was so insolvent, it nearly sank a financial empire. All their government obligations like pensions, road repair, environmental impacts, subsidies, maintaining the infrastructure besides roads, healthcare, union blah blah blah, all now Florida's problem. And what cost? 1 Billion in bonds to be paid off over a lifetime, which can be restructured at any time.
In this bill Disney's district stays so Florida isn't paying the bills, but it's board is now appointed by the governor so Disney isn't in control of it.
Previously the district board was chosen by landowners in the district (Disney and board alums) and now the board members can't have any ties to Disney.
Basically DeSantis Veritas'd Disney's special government district.
The original was dissolved. This is a new district, under state control. Disney does not own it or operate it. Obligations fall to it, yes, but since it is a state entity, it is now no longer Disney's problem.
It was never Disney's problem. Disney wasn't on the hook for $1 billion.
It was more like a holding company that Disney got to use to run around normal laws and taxes. Now it's DeSantis' to screw Disney with if he selects the right board.
It seems Chapek really didn't want to be involved and asked DeSantis what to do. The fact that he went ahead means there was a lot of very heated internal politics.
Comment Approved: While it is uncooth, tagging users in this kind of call-out fashion isn't anywhere near a case of harassment. We avoid call out posts because that tends to be much more worthless and drama-inducing.
All rhetoric typical of election years. You let me know when he signs constitutional carry and bans genital mutilation, and reduces the gun buying age back to 18.
None of these things will happen BTW.
And what changes? Oh, just Disney getting to become a corporation again, instead of having to run a government that was so insolvent, it nearly sank a financial empire. All their government obligations like pensions, road repair, environmental impacts, subsidies, maintaining the infrastructure besides roads, healthcare, union blah blah blah, all now Florida's problem. And what cost? 1 Billion in bonds to be paid off over a lifetime, which can be restructured at any time.
Sure fucking sounds like DeSantis 'won' to me.
In this bill Disney's district stays so Florida isn't paying the bills, but it's board is now appointed by the governor so Disney isn't in control of it.
Previously the district board was chosen by landowners in the district (Disney and board alums) and now the board members can't have any ties to Disney.
Basically DeSantis Veritas'd Disney's special government district.
The original was dissolved. This is a new district, under state control. Disney does not own it or operate it. Obligations fall to it, yes, but since it is a state entity, it is now no longer Disney's problem.
It was never Disney's problem. Disney wasn't on the hook for $1 billion.
It was more like a holding company that Disney got to use to run around normal laws and taxes. Now it's DeSantis' to screw Disney with if he selects the right board.
At the time I asked, no one had posted the bill. But, sure, let's do a callout post that I'm not a time traveler.
Also that somehow DeSantis sponsored a bill, which he can't do?
Methinks op is a tard
Someone approaches with news and expects the entire audience to do their research and validation for them? Get lost, don't at me again.
The author of the Don't Say Gay' bill is now on the district board.
Nice touch. Despite reports to the contrary it seems DeSantis bent Disney over the sink.
It seems Chapek really didn't want to be involved and asked DeSantis what to do. The fact that he went ahead means there was a lot of very heated internal politics.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: While it is uncooth, tagging users in this kind of call-out fashion isn't anywhere near a case of harassment. We avoid call out posts because that tends to be much more worthless and drama-inducing.