Dresden is one of the foundational reasons that the West imposed a taboo on bombing civilians after WW2.
But like most of the things of the principles of West, it's one that solely applies to the West's opponents, never to the West, nor its allies (Ukraine, Azerbaijan).
But like most of the things of the principles of West, it's one that solely applies to the West's opponents, never to the West, nor its allies (Ukraine, Azerbaijan).
Spare me your Kremlin propaganda. You don't live in reality. It does, in fact, apply to the West, and the West is not hypocritical in its application. The West takes great pains to avoid and minimize civilian casualties, and any time it makes mistakes, it is punished in the press for doing so, which is why our enemies routinely use civilian human shields to punish and deter air attacks.
You know who would NEVER use human shields? The enemies of Russia and China, because those motherfuckers wouldn't hesitate for a second.
Also, Azerbaijan is not a Western ALLY. The fact that Israel sells Azerbaijan weapons does not make it a Western ALLY. "In 1992, the U.S. Congress adopted Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, which banned any direct U.S. aid to the government of Azerbaijan." Ukraine isn't an ally yet, either. It's a recipient of aid. Alliances are mutual compacts. Ukraine isn't obligated to the US or EU in any way. This will likely change once the hot war with Russia is over, though. Ukraine doesn't target civilians anyway, but Russia 100% does and has done so a great deal.
It's tiresome for you to call everything you don't like "Kremlin propaganda".
the West is not hypocritical in its application.
You're right. Hypocrisy to the West is like the water fish swim in. It comes so naturally that it need not even be mentioned.
The West takes great pains to avoid and minimize civilian casualties
Like when Biden blew up the family of an Afghan ALLY in retaliation for an "ISIS-Kh" terrorist attack?!
which is why our enemies routinely use civilian human shields to punish and deter air attacks.
Yes, they do so to be able to get propaganda, and you want to deny them that propaganda. None of this has anything at all to do with regard for civilian casualties. They don't care.
It's funny that I can see that Putin doesn't care about civilians, even though the Russian army tries to minimize civilian casualties, but you can't. You think Biden is some sort of Disney prince.
Oh, but that genocide is OK because Azerbaijan is our ALLY! Then you can kill all you want!
"In 1992, the U.S. Congress adopted Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, which banned any direct U.S. aid to the government of Azerbaijan."
Well, good for them, I guess the Armenian lobby managed to get something done, because God knows they wouldn't do anything out of good intentions.
Ukraine isn't an ally yet, either. It's a recipient of aid. Alliances are mutual compacts. Ukraine isn't obligated to the US or EU in any way.
Come on man. They commanded Zelensky to not make peace, and he obeyed. He's literally their slave. "Ukraine" is obliged to bleed the flower of its youth to death for American imperialism.
Ukraine doesn't target civilians anyway, but Russia 100% does and has done so a great deal.
You just keep repeating crap and imagining that it suddenly becomes true. Donetsk.
Like when Biden blew up the family of an Afghan ALLY in retaliation for an "ISIS-Kh" terrorist attack?!
Yes, that was noteworthy for its sheer incompetence. Biden was like "blow something up, maaaan, anything! I just need to be able to say I did something!" white rage miley: "but we don't have a target." Biden: "ask the taliban for one!" #1 warner of chinese miley: "that's a fantastic idea, we can trust them."
This monstrous creature's statements show otherwise.
"trustworthy energy suppliers" does not = ally. We have a lot more economic deals with China than with Azerbaijan, by your logic China is our biggest ally. lol.
Armenia picked a side, and it picked Russia. Had Armenia allied with the West instead, we would have protected it. Nation states do not rush to geographically inconvenient parts of the world to help countries allied to our enemies, just because that country got wrongly attacked.
No country should ever ally with Russia (or China). When the chips are down and helping is inconvenient for them, they simply won't do it.
Yes, that was noteworthy for its sheer incompetence. Biden was like "blow something up, maaaan, anything! I just need to be able to say I did something!" white rage miley: "but we don't have a target." Biden: "ask the taliban for one!" #1 warner of chinese miley: "that's a fantastic idea, we can trust them."
Apparently, he told Isis-Kh that "you will pay". Then he blew up an Afghan family. He said the same thing when the border guards were falsely accused of whipping Haitians. Some joked this meant he would blow up another Afghan family.
"trustworthy energy suppliers" does not = ally. We have a lot more economic deals with China than with Azerbaijan, by your logic China is our biggest ally. lol.
The same corrupt scumbags who say Russia bad because it mounted a wholly justified attack on a non-country, and impose sanctions on it, won't do the same for Azerbaijan. I wonder why. Could it be that hypocrisy is the state religion in the West?
Armenia picked a side, and it picked Russia. Had Armenia allied with the West instead
Yeah? As if you can 'ally with the West' in the Caucasus. Saakashvilli learned that the hard way.
No country should ever ally with Russia (or China). When the chips are down and helping is inconvenient for them, they simply won't do it.
I actually agree. I've never seen a more useless 'ally' than Russia in the Karabach conflict. That said, it was Russia or nothing.
But like most of the things of the principles of West, it's one that solely applies to the West's opponents, never to the West, nor its allies (Ukraine, Azerbaijan).
Spare me your Kremlin propaganda. You don't live in reality. It does, in fact, apply to the West, and the West is not hypocritical in its application. The West takes great pains to avoid and minimize civilian casualties, and any time it makes mistakes, it is punished in the press for doing so, which is why our enemies routinely use civilian human shields to punish and deter air attacks.
You know who would NEVER use human shields? The enemies of Russia and China, because those motherfuckers wouldn't hesitate for a second.
Also, Azerbaijan is not a Western ALLY. The fact that Israel sells Azerbaijan weapons does not make it a Western ALLY. "In 1992, the U.S. Congress adopted Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, which banned any direct U.S. aid to the government of Azerbaijan." Ukraine isn't an ally yet, either. It's a recipient of aid. Alliances are mutual compacts. Ukraine isn't obligated to the US or EU in any way. This will likely change once the hot war with Russia is over, though. Ukraine doesn't target civilians anyway, but Russia 100% does and has done so a great deal.
It's tiresome for you to call everything you don't like "Kremlin propaganda".
You're right. Hypocrisy to the West is like the water fish swim in. It comes so naturally that it need not even be mentioned.
Like when Biden blew up the family of an Afghan ALLY in retaliation for an "ISIS-Kh" terrorist attack?!
Yes, they do so to be able to get propaganda, and you want to deny them that propaganda. None of this has anything at all to do with regard for civilian casualties. They don't care.
It's funny that I can see that Putin doesn't care about civilians, even though the Russian army tries to minimize civilian casualties, but you can't. You think Biden is some sort of Disney prince.
This monstrous creature's statements show otherwise.
Oh, but that genocide is OK because Azerbaijan is our ALLY! Then you can kill all you want!
Well, good for them, I guess the Armenian lobby managed to get something done, because God knows they wouldn't do anything out of good intentions.
Come on man. They commanded Zelensky to not make peace, and he obeyed. He's literally their slave. "Ukraine" is obliged to bleed the flower of its youth to death for American imperialism.
You just keep repeating crap and imagining that it suddenly becomes true. Donetsk.
Yes, that was noteworthy for its sheer incompetence. Biden was like "blow something up, maaaan, anything! I just need to be able to say I did something!" white rage miley: "but we don't have a target." Biden: "ask the taliban for one!" #1 warner of chinese miley: "that's a fantastic idea, we can trust them."
"trustworthy energy suppliers" does not = ally. We have a lot more economic deals with China than with Azerbaijan, by your logic China is our biggest ally. lol.
Armenia picked a side, and it picked Russia. Had Armenia allied with the West instead, we would have protected it. Nation states do not rush to geographically inconvenient parts of the world to help countries allied to our enemies, just because that country got wrongly attacked.
No country should ever ally with Russia (or China). When the chips are down and helping is inconvenient for them, they simply won't do it.
Apparently, he told Isis-Kh that "you will pay". Then he blew up an Afghan family. He said the same thing when the border guards were falsely accused of whipping Haitians. Some joked this meant he would blow up another Afghan family.
The same corrupt scumbags who say Russia bad because it mounted a wholly justified attack on a non-country, and impose sanctions on it, won't do the same for Azerbaijan. I wonder why. Could it be that hypocrisy is the state religion in the West?
Yeah? As if you can 'ally with the West' in the Caucasus. Saakashvilli learned that the hard way.
I actually agree. I've never seen a more useless 'ally' than Russia in the Karabach conflict. That said, it was Russia or nothing.