It's her money. She doesn't support selling these items. If she tells her friend how she feels, and the friend wants to sell them anyway, she's justified in taking the money back. It doesn't matter what country she's in.
Her friend is already making money, at least enough to prove financial viability; she doesn't need more. OPs initial investment has gone from 80% of the capital to 50% already, so money is being made. Appealing to the reddit anti-capitalism streak, her friend is getting greedy. In her particular case she could also bring down serious consequences on herself and those around her.
Right?! Like the internet should only be for intelligent first world women with their children from different dads, onlyfans pages, and rabid feminism/ communism/ hedonism!
I mean it makes sense, its a legal binding investment to provide initial capital to her friend's company and now that she feels she wants to pull out she's in the right to do so. The reasoning doesn't and shouldn't matter, its her money and she is within her rights to reclaim it. She shouldn't be force to be associated with the company if she doesn't like the direction its taking.
Yes, how dare a woman be modest and repulsed by having her money being used for contraceptives. Why can’t she be a useless whore with an onlyfans page or a single mom with kids from different dads! Wait which one is the regressive ideas again?
this. much of the world doesn't play along with western degeneracy. things that are normal today weren't normal 100 years ago. and especially for women in these countries, burning their chastity might as well be suicide... as it should be.
Yer it is.
If I get a loan from a bank to open a store I need to provided all sorts of information about what the business is and what it will be doing. If I then turn that store from a green grocers to a sex shop the bank has every right to pull the money.
you could start with not even being able to TYPE the word "condoms".
Yeah, that's cringe.
fill in with the judgey bullshit about what other people are buying.
People are allowed opinions and morals. Swap it around to something you might be outraged about; imagine you lent a friend money for a business, and they started selling woke shit, or hormone therapy or something.
and finish with the wanting to keep control of money they lend AFTER they lend it.
That's standard practice. She should have done it more officially and invested or something, but she says in that thread that she can pull it out at any time. So she does have control over the money she lent, and thus some inherent control over her friend's business.
OP's take isn't perfect, but I do think it's a lot more nuanced than just 'insane ideas.'
Reddit comments...gross.
Lemme solve this one real quick.
It's her money. She doesn't support selling these items. If she tells her friend how she feels, and the friend wants to sell them anyway, she's justified in taking the money back. It doesn't matter what country she's in.
Her friend is already making money, at least enough to prove financial viability; she doesn't need more. OPs initial investment has gone from 80% of the capital to 50% already, so money is being made. Appealing to the reddit anti-capitalism streak, her friend is getting greedy. In her particular case she could also bring down serious consequences on herself and those around her.
The friend is the asshole.
I think everyone involved is retarded, and it's probably fake and gay.
Taking it seriously, the friend is using the op as a bank, but op can just say no and move on but is being a whiny bitch.
Also, using asterisks like the op does is automatically a sign of retardation. Third world shitholes are third world shitholes.
This. God damn, if you’re too prudish (or childish) to type words like condoms and lube then why are you even on the internet?
Right?! Like the internet should only be for intelligent first world women with their children from different dads, onlyfans pages, and rabid feminism/ communism/ hedonism!
4 liberal fags downvoted you
The responses aren't fake. This is the same shit as that one where they said a father should buy his child a sex toy
undelete service https://www.reveddit.com/v/AmItheAsshole/comments/112sj3u/wibta_if_i26f_pull_my_money_out_of_my_friend27fs/
I mean it makes sense, its a legal binding investment to provide initial capital to her friend's company and now that she feels she wants to pull out she's in the right to do so. The reasoning doesn't and shouldn't matter, its her money and she is within her rights to reclaim it. She shouldn't be force to be associated with the company if she doesn't like the direction its taking.
Yes, how dare a woman be modest and repulsed by having her money being used for contraceptives. Why can’t she be a useless whore with an onlyfans page or a single mom with kids from different dads! Wait which one is the regressive ideas again?
this. much of the world doesn't play along with western degeneracy. things that are normal today weren't normal 100 years ago. and especially for women in these countries, burning their chastity might as well be suicide... as it should be.
Lol you dumbass. That's not close to what is going on nor is she a fucking bank.
Yer it is. If I get a loan from a bank to open a store I need to provided all sorts of information about what the business is and what it will be doing. If I then turn that store from a green grocers to a sex shop the bank has every right to pull the money.
Yeah, that's cringe.
People are allowed opinions and morals. Swap it around to something you might be outraged about; imagine you lent a friend money for a business, and they started selling woke shit, or hormone therapy or something.
That's standard practice. She should have done it more officially and invested or something, but she says in that thread that she can pull it out at any time. So she does have control over the money she lent, and thus some inherent control over her friend's business.
OP's take isn't perfect, but I do think it's a lot more nuanced than just 'insane ideas.'