It's a double edged sword as if you have the state/government mandating what should and shouldn't be viewed by who, it'll start here on an issue that people think is reasonable.
It's something that parents should be on top of with all the parental controls and options available.
I mean, the same paper that advocated this also advocated for the creation of a law against "virtual violence against women and girls", I.E speech that challenges the female ruling class.
I think we're already at the line of no return, and as expected, people are cheering the enemy's victory because they can't make connections between events.
like it because kids will have a harder time accessing it.
Ah yes, because you actually believe the bullshit women are spouting about why kids are turning out messed up.
Regardless, it's your job to protect your kids. Not the government's. Don't you believe in the whole tradwife LARP? Get your tradwife to monitor your kid's internet.
Rightwingers cheering these laws on, are basically cheering for the end of the Anonymous internet and for Wokesheviks in corporations & government to know the names & addresses of people who post "wrong-think" on social media.
No, I am not some lolbert that thinks you can do absolutely nothing about young kids seeing porn on the internet, there is less intrusive government solutions, such as requiring the modern software equilvent of a v-chip in any computer, smart phone, smart TV, etc.
That sounds more intrusive and a yield to government power to me. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework. Unless you're talking about some image-detection AI chip then they would also have to monitor and enforce the distributed content to make sure everything put online complies with the law by including accurate ratings metadata in the files or website tags.
I'm only critiquing the specific v-chip analogy you used, not dismissing the idea of regulation of porn in general, nor saying I'd prefer them require an ID.
. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework.
States can do it too, America is a federalist country. Also I said "software equilvent of a v-chip " like an app or program that parents can go into and have it read a device's web browser(s) to exclude porn websites & pornographic cotent.
Porn is how feminists enslave and castrate young males,
Is it though? I think the education system, then marriage would be the two main culprits.
If the enemy was gaining from it, they wouldn't want to change the system. Same as when they were gaining from trannyism, they had no interest in protecting kids, but now their precious girls are too stupid to realize "male privilege" is political theater, they're suddenly very interested in protecting kids.
Of course, cuck DeSantis passed one. People who pay attention already knew he was women's puppet, but it's nice when he proves it.
Age verify only helps OnlyFans. It doesn't protect children, because the issue is the female teachers grooming them to hate themselves. All these states either fell for women's "porn made the kids trans" lie, or are so incredibly cucked they take advice from women's organizations.
I hate women making money off it, but recognize it's better than being enslaved by your desires for some fucking sadist, pushed into marriage or worse.
Besides, my view is irrelevant, this is what women's groups want, and therefore I oppose it out of principle.
I hate women making money off it, but recognize it's better than being enslaved by your desires for some fucking sadist
But then you should absolute love porn bans.
They won't be able to ban porn off the internet. The only thing bans are going to do is to make sure producers and actors don't benefit from it financially. Bans would destroy the commercial aspect. Porn itself would just further go the way music and movie piracy have gone.
It's not a ban. They're more clever than that. No no. To access it, you have to be on a government database that the feminist government swears they won't ever share. You probably have to either get a government ID or give out your CC.
They're doing what we should do to feminism. Make it impossible to access without banning it.
I wonder what the result of that would be. Ad-supported sites would certainly take a hit because people who don't pay won't want to hand over private information for nothing (they can just go to foreign free sites).
As for subscription services it could go either way. People already have to hand over their CC data anyway, so that wouldn't change anthing. If the government tries to get their grubby hands on that data it could deter people from subscribing, though.
BTW here in Germany we already have an official-ID requirement for porn sites (anything 18+ really). Of course that only affects German sites and requirements were so strict and unrealistic that they AFAIK either shut down or moved to other EU countries. Some tried to fight in court but eventually lost because nothing they did to verify age was ever good enough.
It's a double edged sword as if you have the state/government mandating what should and shouldn't be viewed by who, it'll start here on an issue that people think is reasonable.
It's something that parents should be on top of with all the parental controls and options available.
I mean, the same paper that advocated this also advocated for the creation of a law against "virtual violence against women and girls", I.E speech that challenges the female ruling class.
I think we're already at the line of no return, and as expected, people are cheering the enemy's victory because they can't make connections between events.
Okay handshake. You're not suspicious at all.
Bottom right, fucking retard.
Funded by Alphabet Inc and the European Union.
Ah yes, because you actually believe the bullshit women are spouting about why kids are turning out messed up.
Regardless, it's your job to protect your kids. Not the government's. Don't you believe in the whole tradwife LARP? Get your tradwife to monitor your kid's internet.
Maybe you should care more about the female teachers telling them being male is a disease?
Rightwingers cheering these laws on, are basically cheering for the end of the Anonymous internet and for Wokesheviks in corporations & government to know the names & addresses of people who post "wrong-think" on social media.
No, I am not some lolbert that thinks you can do absolutely nothing about young kids seeing porn on the internet, there is less intrusive government solutions, such as requiring the modern software equilvent of a v-chip in any computer, smart phone, smart TV, etc.
That sounds more intrusive and a yield to government power to me. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework. Unless you're talking about some image-detection AI chip then they would also have to monitor and enforce the distributed content to make sure everything put online complies with the law by including accurate ratings metadata in the files or website tags.
I'm only critiquing the specific v-chip analogy you used, not dismissing the idea of regulation of porn in general, nor saying I'd prefer them require an ID.
States can do it too, America is a federalist country. Also I said "software equilvent of a v-chip " like an app or program that parents can go into and have it read a device's web browser(s) to exclude porn websites & pornographic cotent.
Women know exactly how to play the trad-right. They've done it so many times.
Is it though? I think the education system, then marriage would be the two main culprits.
If the enemy was gaining from it, they wouldn't want to change the system. Same as when they were gaining from trannyism, they had no interest in protecting kids, but now their precious girls are too stupid to realize "male privilege" is political theater, they're suddenly very interested in protecting kids.
Yes, the EU controls the US. You are a brilliant geopolitical analyst.
Handshake with a very handshake type take.
I've slept with enough women to know they're not really worth it, thanks.
Nah I don't sleep with 4/10s.
The European Women's Lobby is already known to be responsible for the UK's misogyny law plan.
The financial backer of the European Women's Lobby is Alphabet Inc, the parent company of Google.
Their recommendations for pornography :
Recognize it as male violence against women and girls
ISPs should force users to confirm they want porn and keep these users in a database that will inevitably get "leaked" when women need it to.
Legislation must be enacted to reduce the distribution of porn to
protect women's financial interestsprotect women and girls.Of course, cuck DeSantis passed one. People who pay attention already knew he was women's puppet, but it's nice when he proves it.
Age verify only helps OnlyFans. It doesn't protect children, because the issue is the female teachers grooming them to hate themselves. All these states either fell for women's "porn made the kids trans" lie, or are so incredibly cucked they take advice from women's organizations.
He likes it if it means men can get their rocks off without being involved with real women.
He hates it if the women in or around porn benefit in any way.
I mean, you're mostly right.
I hate women making money off it, but recognize it's better than being enslaved by your desires for some fucking sadist, pushed into marriage or worse.
Besides, my view is irrelevant, this is what women's groups want, and therefore I oppose it out of principle.
But then you should absolute love porn bans.
They won't be able to ban porn off the internet. The only thing bans are going to do is to make sure producers and actors don't benefit from it financially. Bans would destroy the commercial aspect. Porn itself would just further go the way music and movie piracy have gone.
It's not a ban. They're more clever than that. No no. To access it, you have to be on a government database that the feminist government swears they won't ever share. You probably have to either get a government ID or give out your CC.
They're doing what we should do to feminism. Make it impossible to access without banning it.
I wonder what the result of that would be. Ad-supported sites would certainly take a hit because people who don't pay won't want to hand over private information for nothing (they can just go to foreign free sites).
As for subscription services it could go either way. People already have to hand over their CC data anyway, so that wouldn't change anthing. If the government tries to get their grubby hands on that data it could deter people from subscribing, though.
BTW here in Germany we already have an official-ID requirement for porn sites (anything 18+ really). Of course that only affects German sites and requirements were so strict and unrealistic that they AFAIK either shut down or moved to other EU countries. Some tried to fight in court but eventually lost because nothing they did to verify age was ever good enough.
I can give you a hint.
What is the law again and when was it passed?