It's a double edged sword as if you have the state/government mandating what should and shouldn't be viewed by who, it'll start here on an issue that people think is reasonable.
It's something that parents should be on top of with all the parental controls and options available.
I mean, the same paper that advocated this also advocated for the creation of a law against "virtual violence against women and girls", I.E speech that challenges the female ruling class.
I think we're already at the line of no return, and as expected, people are cheering the enemy's victory because they can't make connections between events.
It's a double edged sword as if you have the state/government mandating what should and shouldn't be viewed by who, it'll start here on an issue that people think is reasonable.
It's something that parents should be on top of with all the parental controls and options available.
I mean, the same paper that advocated this also advocated for the creation of a law against "virtual violence against women and girls", I.E speech that challenges the female ruling class.
I think we're already at the line of no return, and as expected, people are cheering the enemy's victory because they can't make connections between events.