You know how I know cut dudes don't cope? Because it isn't cut dudes coming online REEEEEing about circumcision and calling it mutilation, it's uncut dudes like you who - if you weren't coping - wouldn't care about it at all since it didn't happen to you.
You guys are very sensitive whenever the butchery inflicted on your body is criticized in even the mildest possible forms (only place where you still have sensitivity left). I think deep down you know that this is pretty gross and disturbing, but cognitive dissonance won't allow you to accept it.
Now, why do I care? Because I don't like disgusting and cruel practices inflicted on babies. What's more, I don't want to have to look at dried out mushrooms and scars.
The mushrooms have a nice kind of Catch-22. If a mutilated fellow objects, you say: "AHA, you're complaining about your stolen foreskin. lolz frustrated". If a normal fellow objects, you say "why do you even care that we disfigure babies?"
I don't see you on here REEEEing about all the weird body modification shit they do in africa,
I'm REEEEEEing about people who have piercings, because it's just gross and disgusting. How much more would I REEEEEE if they were doing this to babies?
because long necked dudes with lip plates aren't stealing yo gurl.
You're playing with me. No way this is real. This is like a fat guy being told by a guy with a sixpack "lose some weight fatso", and replying "hey, don't be jelly, women LOVE dadbods. Are you afraid that I'm gonna steal your girl?"
Be real.
superior aesthetics for women, this alone is enough to justify it
lol, this is not even true, but thinking it makes you that guy from the Stonetoss cartoon sawing off his legs because he heard "women prefer shorter guys".
literally everything involving children done for their own good is without their consent, including things like vaccination, education, and eating their vegetables.
Or trooning them. Oh wait, you draw the line on mutilation somewhere, which is just as well, but it's a shame that this (like Russia) is one of your blind spots.
You guys are very sensitive whenever the butchery inflicted on your body is criticized in even the mildest possible forms
Not at all. I've engaged in these arguments many times on reddit, and it's always me alone vs like 20 lunatics calling it mutilation like you, even though they all profess, like you, to being uncircumcised.
Why do you care so much? Why do you feel so strongly about circumcision when it didn't happen to you, and the men who it did happen to, like me, think it's great and are glad it happened. You act like my positive attitude towards it is invalid, and you rail at me that I should feel traumatized and victimized. LOL
Honestly, my old explanation for this is that at some point in your life, someone called your dick ugly because you're uncircumcised, and that you became traumatized as a result, so your ego overcompensated by lashing out at circumcised men. "It's not ME who is inferior and defective, it's YOU!!!!!!" so you, and all these other guys who got your dicks trash talked and never recovered, need to do this to validate yourselves and cope with your feelings of insecurity and inferiority.
That's my honest take. I'm not talking shit to make you feel bad, I honestly believe that's what motivates the dynamic at issue here of uncircumcised men railing against circumcision.
(only place where you still have sensitivity left).
Scientific studies have shown that men who received adult circumcisions reported no loss of sensitivity and no sexual problems. So your belief that cut men have less sensitivity is invalid.
I think deep down you know that this is pretty gross and disturbing, but cognitive dissonance won't allow you to accept it.
Please stop projecting. I think nothing of the kind, and if I have a male child, I will 100% have him circumcised. Any responsible parent would.
Now, why do I care? Because I don't like disgusting and cruel practices inflicted on babies.
Bullshit. There is a ton of shit in the world that you don't complain about, and even with female genital mutilation, you don't get worked up like you do about this. Same with all the other guys just like you who insist circumcision is mutilation when it's not. It's no different than getting your tonsils removed, except even better.
What's more, I don't want to have to look at dried out mushrooms and scars.
The overwhelming majority of people find cut dicks to be more aesthetically pleasing. Maybe you're in the minority, or maybe you're traumatized because you ran into one or more persons from the majority who prefer cut, and he/she told you your dick is ugly.
I know men get whole ass complex whenever they feel insecure about their dicks. I'm super happy I've never been insecure about mine, and I have circumcision to thank in part for that.
You know the kind of person who would call circumcised dicks "dried out mushrooms and scars" a traumatized dude who got his dick called ugly trying to cope by lashing out and doing it "back". Sad.
If a normal fellow objects, you say "why do you even care that we disfigure babies?"
You don't care, you're lying to cover up your embarrassing true motives. I know this for a fact because you people don't engage on the merits. You won't even consider that circumcision has been done for generations thanks to medical benefits, superior hygiene, and protection from STDs.
But no, none of you want to consider why circumcision is NOT considered to be mutilation by the vast majority of people. Why? Because you aren't motivated by the merits, you're motivated by the psychological trauma of getting your dick called ugly.
This is like a fat guy being told by a guy with a sixpack "lose some weight fatso", and replying "hey, don't be jelly, women LOVE dadbods. Are you afraid that I'm gonna steal your girl?"
Projection. In your example, I'm the ripped Chad and you're the fatso. How many studies do I need to link you showing that women prefer cut dicks by large majorities? So it's my cut dick that represents the sixpack, and your uncut one representing the fatso. And you're lashing out with "hey, your 6 pack is mutilated by gross gym equipment and you abuse your body! You should go cry and feel bad and regret doing that to yourself!!!" That's you.
lol, this is not even true
I linked you studies proving that it is. You haven't provided any rebuttal evidence, as expected, because this is an exploration of emotional trauma for you.
Or trooning them. Oh wait, you draw the line on mutilation somewhere, which is just as well, but it's a shame that this (like Russia) is one of your blind spots.
If trooning kids provided tons of benefits and no drawbacks like circumcision, things would be very different. But we know the opposite is true. We know John money trooned a kid and that kid and his brother ended up killing themselves. We know trooning kids is bad, and we know kids get trooned not for their own benefit, but instead for their parents to exhibit a libtard virtue signal. It's child abuse.
By contrast, a parent getting their son circumcised is doing the responsible and correct thing.
You guys are very sensitive whenever the butchery inflicted on your body is criticized in even the mildest possible forms (only place where you still have sensitivity left). I think deep down you know that this is pretty gross and disturbing, but cognitive dissonance won't allow you to accept it.
Now, why do I care? Because I don't like disgusting and cruel practices inflicted on babies. What's more, I don't want to have to look at dried out mushrooms and scars.
The mushrooms have a nice kind of Catch-22. If a mutilated fellow objects, you say: "AHA, you're complaining about your stolen foreskin. lolz frustrated". If a normal fellow objects, you say "why do you even care that we disfigure babies?"
I'm REEEEEEing about people who have piercings, because it's just gross and disgusting. How much more would I REEEEEE if they were doing this to babies?
You're playing with me. No way this is real. This is like a fat guy being told by a guy with a sixpack "lose some weight fatso", and replying "hey, don't be jelly, women LOVE dadbods. Are you afraid that I'm gonna steal your girl?"
Be real.
lol, this is not even true, but thinking it makes you that guy from the Stonetoss cartoon sawing off his legs because he heard "women prefer shorter guys".
Or trooning them. Oh wait, you draw the line on mutilation somewhere, which is just as well, but it's a shame that this (like Russia) is one of your blind spots.
Not at all. I've engaged in these arguments many times on reddit, and it's always me alone vs like 20 lunatics calling it mutilation like you, even though they all profess, like you, to being uncircumcised.
Why do you care so much? Why do you feel so strongly about circumcision when it didn't happen to you, and the men who it did happen to, like me, think it's great and are glad it happened. You act like my positive attitude towards it is invalid, and you rail at me that I should feel traumatized and victimized. LOL
Honestly, my old explanation for this is that at some point in your life, someone called your dick ugly because you're uncircumcised, and that you became traumatized as a result, so your ego overcompensated by lashing out at circumcised men. "It's not ME who is inferior and defective, it's YOU!!!!!!" so you, and all these other guys who got your dicks trash talked and never recovered, need to do this to validate yourselves and cope with your feelings of insecurity and inferiority.
That's my honest take. I'm not talking shit to make you feel bad, I honestly believe that's what motivates the dynamic at issue here of uncircumcised men railing against circumcision.
Scientific studies have shown that men who received adult circumcisions reported no loss of sensitivity and no sexual problems. So your belief that cut men have less sensitivity is invalid.
Please stop projecting. I think nothing of the kind, and if I have a male child, I will 100% have him circumcised. Any responsible parent would.
Bullshit. There is a ton of shit in the world that you don't complain about, and even with female genital mutilation, you don't get worked up like you do about this. Same with all the other guys just like you who insist circumcision is mutilation when it's not. It's no different than getting your tonsils removed, except even better.
The overwhelming majority of people find cut dicks to be more aesthetically pleasing. Maybe you're in the minority, or maybe you're traumatized because you ran into one or more persons from the majority who prefer cut, and he/she told you your dick is ugly.
I know men get whole ass complex whenever they feel insecure about their dicks. I'm super happy I've never been insecure about mine, and I have circumcision to thank in part for that.
You know the kind of person who would call circumcised dicks "dried out mushrooms and scars" a traumatized dude who got his dick called ugly trying to cope by lashing out and doing it "back". Sad.
You don't care, you're lying to cover up your embarrassing true motives. I know this for a fact because you people don't engage on the merits. You won't even consider that circumcision has been done for generations thanks to medical benefits, superior hygiene, and protection from STDs.
But no, none of you want to consider why circumcision is NOT considered to be mutilation by the vast majority of people. Why? Because you aren't motivated by the merits, you're motivated by the psychological trauma of getting your dick called ugly.
Projection. In your example, I'm the ripped Chad and you're the fatso. How many studies do I need to link you showing that women prefer cut dicks by large majorities? So it's my cut dick that represents the sixpack, and your uncut one representing the fatso. And you're lashing out with "hey, your 6 pack is mutilated by gross gym equipment and you abuse your body! You should go cry and feel bad and regret doing that to yourself!!!" That's you.
I linked you studies proving that it is. You haven't provided any rebuttal evidence, as expected, because this is an exploration of emotional trauma for you.
If trooning kids provided tons of benefits and no drawbacks like circumcision, things would be very different. But we know the opposite is true. We know John money trooned a kid and that kid and his brother ended up killing themselves. We know trooning kids is bad, and we know kids get trooned not for their own benefit, but instead for their parents to exhibit a libtard virtue signal. It's child abuse.
By contrast, a parent getting their son circumcised is doing the responsible and correct thing.