It might as well be in Hunter Biden's laptop for how it will be treated

Jessica Rose wrote more about the fishy western blots - and it's a bit annoying that the linked article doesn't cover what she said, since her link is already in there and this is all several weeks old by now.

Basically the western blots look fake because they're automated, or so it's claimed. Upon establishing that, the question seems to revolve around whether or not you can automate western blots with any reliability.

So even though robo-Jess seems like a dream, I am firm in my belief that human-Jess cannot be removed from the Western Blot equation, speaking for myself as human-Jess. There are probably only a few people left who will agree with me on this, but I stand firm. There are just some things that you can’t - and dare I say, shouldn’t - automate. Cookie production is one, and Western Blots are another. Sorry Pfizer. Even with all of your money and robo-Jess, I personally, as a biochemist and protein biologist, will always prefer the roughness and authenticity of the hand-made Western Blot.

I suppose I should end this Substack by saying that although the perfect, gorgeous Westerns produced by Pfizer may not be fake, per se, they certainly are not ‘reliable’ either - by my assessment.

In any case it's no smoking gun, at least not anywhere close when compared to all the other damning stuff you can say about the vaxx, which goes beyond the realm of fishy and firmly into 'this shit is obviously trash'.

The fact there could be actual evidence to prove that Pfizer and BioNTech engaged in fraud by fabricating critical data would have major ramifications. For instance, their indemnity status (protection from any legal liability resulting from deaths or injuries caused by their product) which was written into their purchasing contracts and signed by many countries, would cease to apply.

That'd be nice if any lawyers had the balls to press it, which they won't.

Damning details in both reports exposed how key regulators such as the EMA, FDA, Health Canada and the MHRA were fully aware of the significant drop in RNA integrity (which is a critical quality attribute) to ~55% in the commercial batches (Process 2: large scale production) of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine compared to ~78% in the clinical batches (Process 1: small scale production).

Ouch they performed even worse than advertised...by a significant margin.

Another anonymous scientific expert, known as Jikkyleaks commented on the BioNTech/Pfizer Western blot scandal, stating: “They are never used as a definitive experiment in a lab situation. They are merely computer representations of electropherograms and not Westerns. So even if they are not fake, they are not a verification of any experiment. It’s like putting out a photo of a Picasso and saying that is proof that you have the original Picasso. Who would believe that?”

That boils it down well.

In Part 2, I investigate the scandal known as #Humpgate, taking a further look at the truncated mRNA species; the aberrant proteins (shortened peptides- not the full-length spike protein) being expressed in vitro because of them; the probable causes and the wider implications of all of this concerning the safety of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.

For fucks sakes...

Pfizer’s legal immunity is voided if they committed Fraud

That's not how the law works lmao, they make the laws, anything they want to be legal, is legal, end of story.

Relevant Bob Moran Painting

What I've learned over the last 6 years say, is that there are many many many opportunities for these cases to be ignored or thrown out regardless of merit all the way up and down the judicial system