Jessica Rose wrote more about the fishy western blots - and it's a bit annoying that the linked article doesn't cover what she said, since her link is already in there and this is all several weeks old by now.

Basically the western blots look fake because they're automated, or so it's claimed. Upon establishing that, the question seems to revolve around whether or not you can automate western blots with any reliability.

So even though robo-Jess seems like a dream, I am firm in my belief that human-Jess cannot be removed from the Western Blot equation, speaking for myself as human-Jess. There are probably only a few people left who will agree with me on this, but I stand firm. There are just some things that you can’t - and dare I say, shouldn’t - automate. Cookie production is one, and Western Blots are another. Sorry Pfizer. Even with all of your money and robo-Jess, I personally, as a biochemist and protein biologist, will always prefer the roughness and authenticity of the hand-made Western Blot.

I suppose I should end this Substack by saying that although the perfect, gorgeous Westerns produced by Pfizer may not be fake, per se, they certainly are not ‘reliable’ either - by my assessment.

In any case it's no smoking gun, at least not anywhere close when compared to all the other damning stuff you can say about the vaxx, which goes beyond the realm of fishy and firmly into 'this shit is obviously trash'.