As per usual on an Imp post, there appears to be nothing in the article about "keeping just the sex organs functional". I'd argue it's because that's complete nonsense (how?!), but I can't, because this gem proves that "complete nonsense" is not something that would stop this lady:
The prospect of male pregnancy is not, as many would imagine, fanciful, or a piece of science fiction. In 1999, Robert Winston told reporters that there were no intrinsic medical problems with initiating a male pregnancy: the danger would be in the delivery. We already know that pregnancies can come to term outside the uterus [31]. The liver is a promising implantation site, because of its excellent blood supply.
You know, I'd expect a bioethicist to be at least somewhat familiar with 8th grade human anatomy, but that's only because I'm an insufferable optimist. Clearly, I'm wrong; I forgot it was Current Year +8. Holy shit, the absolute state of western "science". This is so insanely stupid, Lysenko is shaking his head in the burning pits of hell, thinking "holy shit lady, take your meds".
When I saw she said using male bodies, I thought she meant braindead sperm producers, not male pregnancies.
The moment when women's sick ideas outdo even my prediction of them.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. Killing us and implanting wombs into us to bear their all-female heirs sounds right up their mentally warped, sadistic alley. There's a certain kind of feeling of victory in it, the enslavement of your enemy to produce the children of the victors.
Well, you could have read it. It's not very long, and the part that's about using men is easy to find.
Also, she's not proposing implanting uteruses into men. It's even dumber than that. It's literally just "lol we just hook up a fetus into a stranger's liver", because apparently the uterus is just a sack to keep the fetus in, right. What.
And anyway, as usual, you're gay and your shit's all retarded. The whole post appears to be presuming that critics of the idea are arguing from a feminist standpoint - "waah, you can't do that to wahmen". I'm sure someone is, feminists never waste an opportunity to make something about themselves, but all the criticism I've personally seen was along the lines of "aww sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension", "there's no way that would actually work and not cause the kid to be born with horrific defects", and "what the fuck is wrong with you, this some Tleilaxu shit".
Also, she's not proposing implanting uteruses into men. It's even dumber than that. It's literally just "lol we just hook up a fetus into a stranger's liver", because apparently the uterus is just a sack to keep the fetus in, right. What.
Oh, I thought it might have tied into that article from a while back about trying to give a trans woman a womb.
The whole post appears to be presuming that critics of the idea are arguing from a feminist standpoint - "waah, you can't do that to wahmen"
No, my point is that women once again lied to play the victim, conveniently omitting the fact that one of their own wrote this so they could go off on long rants about men.
I'm not defending the idea, I'm attacking the lack of acknowledgement that this woman wanted to do the same thing to men. We don't fucking matter, of course. Only the ruling class does.
In addition, I identify some intriguing possibilities, including the use of male bodies–perhaps thereby circumventing some potential feminist objections.
Anyone who pushed this garbage lie about "men using brain dead women as breeding tools" should be marked as an agent of feminism.
And then I will beg for the money of the alphagigachad millionaire supertall giantpenis that you are, but you will look at me and push me over a cliff like Scar in the Lion King.
EDIT: also, wouldn't that hurt my male Hungarians as well? Are you becoming such a feminist-in-reverse that you want to have a country's worth of men to starve just so a filthy wahman can't talk back to you? :D
I beg you, Imp, please, tell me your political insight on my country, like you regularly do on every country. Please. We need a hero like you. I beg you!!!!!!
As per usual on an Imp post, there appears to be nothing in the article about "keeping just the sex organs functional". I'd argue it's because that's complete nonsense (how?!), but I can't, because this gem proves that "complete nonsense" is not something that would stop this lady:
You know, I'd expect a bioethicist to be at least somewhat familiar with 8th grade human anatomy, but that's only because I'm an insufferable optimist. Clearly, I'm wrong; I forgot it was Current Year +8. Holy shit, the absolute state of western "science". This is so insanely stupid, Lysenko is shaking his head in the burning pits of hell, thinking "holy shit lady, take your meds".
When I saw she said using male bodies, I thought she meant braindead sperm producers, not male pregnancies.
The moment when women's sick ideas outdo even my prediction of them.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised. Killing us and implanting wombs into us to bear their all-female heirs sounds right up their mentally warped, sadistic alley. There's a certain kind of feeling of victory in it, the enslavement of your enemy to produce the children of the victors.
Well, you could have read it. It's not very long, and the part that's about using men is easy to find.
Also, she's not proposing implanting uteruses into men. It's even dumber than that. It's literally just "lol we just hook up a fetus into a stranger's liver", because apparently the uterus is just a sack to keep the fetus in, right. What.
And anyway, as usual, you're gay and your shit's all retarded. The whole post appears to be presuming that critics of the idea are arguing from a feminist standpoint - "waah, you can't do that to wahmen". I'm sure someone is, feminists never waste an opportunity to make something about themselves, but all the criticism I've personally seen was along the lines of "aww sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension", "there's no way that would actually work and not cause the kid to be born with horrific defects", and "what the fuck is wrong with you, this some Tleilaxu shit".
Oh, I thought it might have tied into that article from a while back about trying to give a trans woman a womb.
No, my point is that women once again lied to play the victim, conveniently omitting the fact that one of their own wrote this so they could go off on long rants about men.
I'm not defending the idea, I'm attacking the lack of acknowledgement that this woman wanted to do the same thing to men. We don't fucking matter, of course. Only the ruling class does.
Anyone who pushed this garbage lie about "men using brain dead women as breeding tools" should be marked as an agent of feminism.
You already do that to anyone who ever looked at a woman without chimpout rage like you do, mate.
Hopefully your currency will inflate to the point that you can't afford internet to make these stupid comments.
And then I will beg for the money of the alphagigachad millionaire supertall giantpenis that you are, but you will look at me and push me over a cliff like Scar in the Lion King.
EDIT: also, wouldn't that hurt my male Hungarians as well? Are you becoming such a feminist-in-reverse that you want to have a country's worth of men to starve just so a filthy wahman can't talk back to you? :D
Usually, when a currency fails, the leader of that country is removed in some way.
It would be nice if Von Der Leyen's bad cop was taken off the table and replaced with genuine opposition.
I beg you, Imp, please, tell me your political insight on my country, like you regularly do on every country. Please. We need a hero like you. I beg you!!!!!!
It's not my political insight, it's objective fact. The Fidesz MEPs gave the last votes required to begin the Von Der Leyen Commission in 2019.
She would have failed her bid for election as leader of the European Commission without them.
Yeah, like in Zimbabwe. Or Argentina. Or Greece. Or Czechoslovakia. Or Venezuela. Or...
Point taken. I can't think of any other way to get rid of Orban.