the only thing remotely close would be defamation, but again, it fails both a 12b6 and a motion for summary judgment. the case would never get litigated on the merits. even if everything bad we've seen portrayed about her is true, that she's some evil deep state's next goebbels, a first year law student could win that case for her.
in case you haven't noticed, pulling strings with buddies at big tech to get people censored is generally not illegal. without additional evidence of some other wrongdoing, which they don't have, it doesn't go anywhere.
Lawsuit over damages to brand/income.
It's not impossible, just not likely to go anywhere
Also, absolute truth is a defense against defamation claims, so that's easy too
nonsense.
the only thing remotely close would be defamation, but again, it fails both a 12b6 and a motion for summary judgment. the case would never get litigated on the merits. even if everything bad we've seen portrayed about her is true, that she's some evil deep state's next goebbels, a first year law student could win that case for her.
in case you haven't noticed, pulling strings with buddies at big tech to get people censored is generally not illegal. without additional evidence of some other wrongdoing, which they don't have, it doesn't go anywhere.