The Hill is worried how many men are rejecting starting a family in favor of living a good life.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
By admitting I was correct
Also, you have bragged about your impeccable finances allowing you to retire early. Why are you still funding the enemy if you are in such good financial shape? It doesn't sound like you need the returns on those investments.
That's one of the criticisms I have of your world view. I doubt it's going to motivate anyone to do much besides yell on the internet and maybe the odd ineffective boycott here or there. It's actually a de-radicalizer of men and will attract almost exclusively terminally online freaks.
Because you never know what can happen. I might get blacklisted from employment for "misogyny" one day and have to live off what I have for the next 40-50 years.
I also enjoy watching the markets, trying to beat certain investors and it's a hobby women can't take from me. So there's that.
Well, I don't want to call for violence, I pinned a post on my community explaining the practical reasons for that by another user (yes, it's not just me that posts there), it's quite a good read. It suggests that women want an increase in male violence so they can push that they need to send us to war. It ties neatly into that psychopath from Reduxx pushing that boys should be drafted.
Ouch, I'm not terminally online.
I just don't know where to go with my ideology. I can dig up all the information, make huge lists, explain things, and even without the botted downvotes, I hit a wall.
I was going to try Twitter, but Eliza Bleu will probably ban me.
40-50 years? That's more optimistic than usual.
Why would they want to take away your hobby of funding feminism?
Indeed it is impractical. I've seen people here lament that they can't fed post, but it really doesn't do anything. No one is going to be allowed by the feds to organize 1776 part II on the public internet. There is no economic basis to sustain a revolutionary war against the government.
That's part of the problem with your ideology. Challenging the system is a huge risk. It's more likely to make you poor, dead, or in prison than wealthy and successful. It's a serious personal sacrifice. It requires people in a movement to care about one another and their goal, to put it above their own well-being, but your whole world view is built upon rejection of any sort of higher calling. It's why I call you a female exclusionary liberal. You are fueled entirely by selfishness and bitterness. There's no love in you so whatever MGTOW-ish thing you are trying will always fail to launch.