The Supreme Court saying that denying a tranny an unnecessary hysterectomy is "sex discrimination" is like saying that denying a pension to a 20 year old crackpot who thinks he's 253 year old Napoleon is "financial discrimination".
Insanity. The article says something about an employee-discrimination precedent too. It also says:
a district judge has awarded a summary judgment against a Maryland Catholic hospital for refusing to remove the healthy uterus of a patient who identifies as male
The catholic part is a distraction. The court is claiming it can force doctors to perform cosmetic surgery and remove healthy organs now? And trans movement is so powerful that nobody in medicine can stand up against this barbary?
The Supreme Court saying that denying a tranny an unnecessary hysterectomy is "sex discrimination" is like saying that denying a pension to a 20 year old crackpot who thinks he's 253 year old Napoleon is "financial discrimination".
Insanity. The article says something about an employee-discrimination precedent too. It also says:
The catholic part is a distraction. The court is claiming it can force doctors to perform cosmetic surgery and remove healthy organs now? And trans movement is so powerful that nobody in medicine can stand up against this barbary?
Do they have to amputate the limbs of people with body integrity identity disorder, too?
Performing unnecessary major surgery violates the Hippocratic oath.