Wait, I thought you claimed women never got convicted of anything, and that lying about rape would guarantee a jail sentence for the man?
But I guess you threw that out of the window and decided this was a nice opportunity for you to defend your beloved grooming gangs. Only thing you love more than troons.
Protected classes have a higher chance of winning cases, because of their advocacy groups.
I'm surprised you're still standing behind the fucking TERFs. That poor kid being mutilated by his feminist mother with the only criticism being from MRAs and conservatives as the so-called anti-trans feminists said nothing.
Supporting TERFs was the biggest mistake the right made in 2022. They deflected the conversation away from women's hate, secured their spaces and disappeared once they had what they wanted.
Protected classes have a higher chance of winning cases, because of their advocacy groups.
Oh dear, looks like you accidentally admitted that Pakistanis are higher on the Victimology Game than women. QUICK! SAVE THE SITUATION!
I'm surprised you're still standing behind the fucking TERFs.
And I'll continue as long as they are useful.
Supporting TERFs was the biggest mistake the right made in 2022. They deflected the conversation away from women's hate, secured their spaces and disappeared once they had what they wanted.
Like I always say, you'd make a great stand-up comedian. But you'd have to cut out your love for the grooming gangs.
It's difficult for the woman to win when the man's bank presented information showing he was never in the country he supposedly pimped her out in.
It is? Normally, you'd claim that no charges will be brought, or that files will get 'lost'.
Say, why did they bring charges to begin with in the United Femdom? You're always telling me that women are responsible for way more murders than men, and that charges simply aren't brought and the statistics cover it up.
They aren't fucking useful. That's what I'm trying to tell you.
Well, I'll put that in the drawer with the rest of your predictions, like "the male curfew is coming" and "Kim Potter will have her charges quietly dropped".
Are you trying a twofer in this thread: defending both troons and grooming gangs?
Normally, you'd go on and on about how there would be grand conspiracies to keep every woman out of prison, but now you're not very chatty all of a sudden.
I guess the bank also ensured that charges would be pursued and that they wouldn't be dropped.
I don't see how them losing when literally every shred of evidence is against them is proof that they don't rig the system.
Sometimes you can't rig it hard enough to counterweight the evidence against you.
You could even say that they allowed this to happen because it gives the system an illusion of fairness if they lose trials where they have literally no argument.
Was just about to post this, place your bets on punishment.
I'd bet a 1-2 year suspended sentence, where she only sees jail for a month max.
Even if I'm wrong, it'll still be a fraction of what she deserves for ruining some innocents lives.
I'd be surprised for any jail time or any reporting at all done on this to be honest, the UK is cucked beyond saving at this point
Because obviously MEN must have traumatized her and made her the way she is.
It probably would have done better if you posted it. I have stalkers here.
Should have said it was White guys smdh
Um, I suspect the alleged attack actually happened and the daily mail lied...
Archive Link
Wait, I thought you claimed women never got convicted of anything, and that lying about rape would guarantee a jail sentence for the man?
But I guess you threw that out of the window and decided this was a nice opportunity for you to defend your beloved grooming gangs. Only thing you love more than troons.
AoV, stop. Turn back. No, don't.
You're doing that thing where you like fighting with Imp so much that you'll pick fights even when they don't make sense, or when he's actually right.
You're arguing with Imp and losing. Time to take a step back on this one.
All tony does is slob on imp's knob. That faggot literally can't get enough of him.
Hey, everyone needs a hobby. And if it doesn't hurt anyone, and it amused me, I'm all in favor.
Why would it not make sense? He regularly claims that it's impossible for a woman to get convicted in the "female-dominated" (or whatever) courts
Protected classes have a higher chance of winning cases, because of their advocacy groups.
I'm surprised you're still standing behind the fucking TERFs. That poor kid being mutilated by his feminist mother with the only criticism being from MRAs and conservatives as the so-called anti-trans feminists said nothing.
Supporting TERFs was the biggest mistake the right made in 2022. They deflected the conversation away from women's hate, secured their spaces and disappeared once they had what they wanted.
Oh dear, looks like you accidentally admitted that Pakistanis are higher on the Victimology Game than women. QUICK! SAVE THE SITUATION!
And I'll continue as long as they are useful.
Like I always say, you'd make a great stand-up comedian. But you'd have to cut out your love for the grooming gangs.
It's difficult for the woman to win when the man's bank presented information showing he was never in the country he supposedly pimped her out in.
They aren't fucking useful. That's what I'm trying to tell you. They used you for their purpose and disappeared.
It is? Normally, you'd claim that no charges will be brought, or that files will get 'lost'.
Say, why did they bring charges to begin with in the United Femdom? You're always telling me that women are responsible for way more murders than men, and that charges simply aren't brought and the statistics cover it up.
Well, I'll put that in the drawer with the rest of your predictions, like "the male curfew is coming" and "Kim Potter will have her charges quietly dropped".
Are you trying a twofer in this thread: defending both troons and grooming gangs?
Yeah, I don't think they can "lose" evidence that the bank can just replicate again.
Normally, you'd go on and on about how there would be grand conspiracies to keep every woman out of prison, but now you're not very chatty all of a sudden.
I guess the bank also ensured that charges would be pursued and that they wouldn't be dropped.
I don't see how them losing when literally every shred of evidence is against them is proof that they don't rig the system.
Sometimes you can't rig it hard enough to counterweight the evidence against you.
You could even say that they allowed this to happen because it gives the system an illusion of fairness if they lose trials where they have literally no argument.