It's difficult for the woman to win when the man's bank presented information showing he was never in the country he supposedly pimped her out in.
It is? Normally, you'd claim that no charges will be brought, or that files will get 'lost'.
Say, why did they bring charges to begin with in the United Femdom? You're always telling me that women are responsible for way more murders than men, and that charges simply aren't brought and the statistics cover it up.
They aren't fucking useful. That's what I'm trying to tell you.
Well, I'll put that in the drawer with the rest of your predictions, like "the male curfew is coming" and "Kim Potter will have her charges quietly dropped".
Are you trying a twofer in this thread: defending both troons and grooming gangs?
Normally, you'd go on and on about how there would be grand conspiracies to keep every woman out of prison, but now you're not very chatty all of a sudden.
I guess the bank also ensured that charges would be pursued and that they wouldn't be dropped.
I don't see how them losing when literally every shred of evidence is against them is proof that they don't rig the system.
Sometimes you can't rig it hard enough to counterweight the evidence against you.
You could even say that they allowed this to happen because it gives the system an illusion of fairness if they lose trials where they have literally no argument.
It's difficult for the woman to win when the man's bank presented information showing he was never in the country he supposedly pimped her out in.
They aren't fucking useful. That's what I'm trying to tell you. They used you for their purpose and disappeared.
It is? Normally, you'd claim that no charges will be brought, or that files will get 'lost'.
Say, why did they bring charges to begin with in the United Femdom? You're always telling me that women are responsible for way more murders than men, and that charges simply aren't brought and the statistics cover it up.
Well, I'll put that in the drawer with the rest of your predictions, like "the male curfew is coming" and "Kim Potter will have her charges quietly dropped".
Are you trying a twofer in this thread: defending both troons and grooming gangs?
Yeah, I don't think they can "lose" evidence that the bank can just replicate again.
Normally, you'd go on and on about how there would be grand conspiracies to keep every woman out of prison, but now you're not very chatty all of a sudden.
I guess the bank also ensured that charges would be pursued and that they wouldn't be dropped.
I don't see how them losing when literally every shred of evidence is against them is proof that they don't rig the system.
Sometimes you can't rig it hard enough to counterweight the evidence against you.
You could even say that they allowed this to happen because it gives the system an illusion of fairness if they lose trials where they have literally no argument.