I'm asking why foreigners aren't legally forbidden from holding political office. Something that has strangely been true since the founding of the nation,
More interestingly to me was that you defined only 'foreign born people' as foreigners. ius sanguinis FTW.
Probably because there were tons of people coming in. (Also, you probably mean 'founding of the state', not the nation.)
so it doesn't have anything to do with the Bolshevik corpse puppet show currently squatting in the white house.
You said: 'why are', not 'why have then been'. Rest assured that if it were to the disadvantage of the regime, it would disappear in an instant.
More interestingly to me was that you defined only 'foreign born people' as foreigners. ius sanguinis FTW.
Probably because there were tons of people coming in. (Also, you probably mean 'founding of the state', not the nation.)
You said: 'why are', not 'why have then been'. Rest assured that if it were to the disadvantage of the regime, it would disappear in an instant.
At no point did I use the word we. Are you even replying to the right comment? Even for you this is especially retarded.
Where did I say that you did?