You can't. It's the nature of leadership by executive, versus leadership by bureaucracy.
Executive leadership involves very few people making command decisions at a given time. It will be generally inconsistent, but you will clearly see the intentions of a single person be manifest.
Bureaucratic leadership requires a plethora of procedural detail. It absolutely generates consistency, but it will have a perpetual gap of incompleteness, and bureaucratic subversion, stupidity, and inflexibility will manifest.
It's Godel's Incompleteness Theorem come to life:
No logical system can be complete AND consistent.
That logical system which is consistent must be inherently incomplete.
That logical system which is entirely complete and covers all things, must inherently be inconsistent.
There are no exceptions. All systems based on logical coherence will have this failure, forever. Including math and logic themselves.
If you think about it, the is an inherent problem of principles and ideology. They represents an objective moral framework to the universe which, at best, should be inherently internally consistent. Inevitably, this system must generate inconsistent results.
You can't. It's the nature of leadership by executive, versus leadership by bureaucracy.
Executive leadership involves very few people making command decisions at a given time. It will be generally inconsistent, but you will clearly see the intentions of a single person be manifest.
Bureaucratic leadership requires a plethora of procedural detail. It absolutely generates consistency, but it will have a perpetual gap of incompleteness, and bureaucratic subversion, stupidity, and inflexibility will manifest.
It's Godel's Incompleteness Theorem come to life:
So Elon is a Complete Logical System? Cool.
If you think about it, the is an inherent problem of principles and ideology. They represents an objective moral framework to the universe which, at best, should be inherently internally consistent. Inevitably, this system must generate inconsistent results.
Ideological Totalism is inherently inconsistent.