and again, the end result of this perspective is that a burglar crackhead that steals TVs to smoke up is displaying power with his "redistribution of wealth"... it's a materialistic view to the point of absurdity.
it makes much more sense to say that the crackhead holds no power over his addiction, and equally it makes more sense to say the woman holds no power against the people that have convinced her to hate men and love spending. and she did indeed require convincing, it did not come naturally.
No it's biology. Women are biologically wired to feel entitled to the product of men's labour, and men are biologically wired to bend over backwards to give women what they want, so every institution in our society is structured to that end. There is no female conspiracy, and I've never agreed with Imp about that, but to call it a Jewish conspiracy is equally absurd.
and again, the end result of this perspective is that a burglar crackhead that steals TVs to smoke up is displaying power with his "redistribution of wealth"... it's a materialistic view to the point of absurdity.
it makes much more sense to say that the crackhead holds no power over his addiction, and equally it makes more sense to say the woman holds no power against the people that have convinced her to hate men and love spending. and she did indeed require convincing, it did not come naturally.
No it's biology. Women are biologically wired to feel entitled to the product of men's labour, and men are biologically wired to bend over backwards to give women what they want, so every institution in our society is structured to that end. There is no female conspiracy, and I've never agreed with Imp about that, but to call it a Jewish conspiracy is equally absurd.