Only when societal pressures change, will these crimes change.
There is no penalty, and in fact quite a chance for benefit, towards a parent if their child becomes a criminal. So why would they teach them not to? Because raping and pillaging lowers property values of their landlords? They don't care. Never will.
"Let not the sins of the father pass on to the son" is purely a one-way street. The father has responsibility. As does the mother. And if they don't got one, DNA test 'em and find the pump'n'dumper. Because their offspring's actions are their fault.
We're not doing this "crimes of the father" bullshit, because we're not going to embrace inter-temporal collective guilt. Germany shows why you don't do that (both times), and the Left is currently pushing to make whites answer for the crimes of their race and fore-bearers. It's all still wrong.
What is correct is having that lady shoot the guy that stole her car. Allow not only for armed self-defense, but armed self-defense of property, and this shit would magically go away. If you don't want to do that, you can always just allow the police to enforce the law, instead of creating a Criminalist society.
No retard, learn to read. Going father-to-child was the failure, the other direction is responsibility. Or what, are you raising little shits with no respect for society, culture, and law, and are afraid it'll come down on you for your shitty parenting and criminally negligent child-rearing?
Germany shows why you don't do that (both times),
They're blaming the sins of the father on the child.
and the Left is currently pushing to make whites answer for the crimes of their race and fore-bearers.
They're blaming the sins of the father on the child.
The blame goes the other way. Your kid is a piece of shit? Your fault. You could have raised them better. You educated them in such a way as to make criminality a possibility. And your worthless parents didn't give two shits to make you feel the need to discourage criminality in your kids, either.
You're not responsible for some white guy 600 years ago working alongside a black man to import farm labor, but that white guy is, strictly speaking, responsible for eventually giving birth in a lineage chain to someone who can't read like you.
The blame doesn't go the other way either. They are adults. The only reason you blame the father is because they are still children who can't be expected to be adults yet. If they are adults, that responsibility is not necessary.
Only when societal pressures change, will these crimes change.
There is no penalty, and in fact quite a chance for benefit, towards a parent if their child becomes a criminal. So why would they teach them not to? Because raping and pillaging lowers property values of their landlords? They don't care. Never will.
"Let not the sins of the father pass on to the son" is purely a one-way street. The father has responsibility. As does the mother. And if they don't got one, DNA test 'em and find the pump'n'dumper. Because their offspring's actions are their fault.
No retard, we're not doing that.
We're not doing this "crimes of the father" bullshit, because we're not going to embrace inter-temporal collective guilt. Germany shows why you don't do that (both times), and the Left is currently pushing to make whites answer for the crimes of their race and fore-bearers. It's all still wrong.
What is correct is having that lady shoot the guy that stole her car. Allow not only for armed self-defense, but armed self-defense of property, and this shit would magically go away. If you don't want to do that, you can always just allow the police to enforce the law, instead of creating a Criminalist society.
No retard, learn to read. Going father-to-child was the failure, the other direction is responsibility. Or what, are you raising little shits with no respect for society, culture, and law, and are afraid it'll come down on you for your shitty parenting and criminally negligent child-rearing?
They're blaming the sins of the father on the child.
They're blaming the sins of the father on the child.
The blame goes the other way. Your kid is a piece of shit? Your fault. You could have raised them better. You educated them in such a way as to make criminality a possibility. And your worthless parents didn't give two shits to make you feel the need to discourage criminality in your kids, either.
You're not responsible for some white guy 600 years ago working alongside a black man to import farm labor, but that white guy is, strictly speaking, responsible for eventually giving birth in a lineage chain to someone who can't read like you.
The blame doesn't go the other way either. They are adults. The only reason you blame the father is because they are still children who can't be expected to be adults yet. If they are adults, that responsibility is not necessary.