Look at the top of TD yesterday, the UK government saying "protecting women" offends trannies and a bunch of simps in the replies saying they protect women.
If women unilaterally repealed the Second Amendment, older people and women's brainwashed school products would make excuses for them.
That's why Nuremberg 2.0 is so important - they have to be exposed to a level that even wakes up the simps and tradcucks.
Already kinda happened, the Afghans (a 'cisheteropatriarchal' culture if I've ever seen one) used homemade single-shot rifles as part of their arsenal in the wars against both the commie Soviets and American-led globohomo. They had previously used these jezails to great effect against the British...200 years ago.
The closest approximation I can think of is if a militia of American Christian nationalists were able to hold out against a vastly larger and better-equipped blue helmet occupying force for 20 years until the UN finally fucked off, despite having to wield M16s and Revolution-era Kentucky rifles against drones, jets, MOABs and the rest of today's cutting-edge arsenal in general.
I'll give you that actually. Women spewing hate for men is barely notable because they all do it.
For me, what made this interesting is that she didn't bury what they really want. She outright said she supports women killing men. Usually they try to hide it in softer wording, but not this time.
Talks about how she might have a "gay bone" and might start dating women because she sucks at picking guys to be with.
Another dumb and vocal Hollywood broad with an effed up life, that can't accept personal responsibility or the consequences of her actions and decisions.
It's less that it reveals the More Feminine Way agenda, and more that it shows us the incredible double-standard that exists that we all already knew about. Obviously a man couldn't say those things and get away with it.
An army of men with bows and arrows on horseback would still defeat an army of women with modern weapons. Change my mind.
It'll never reach that point.
Look at the top of TD yesterday, the UK government saying "protecting women" offends trannies and a bunch of simps in the replies saying they protect women.
If women unilaterally repealed the Second Amendment, older people and women's brainwashed school products would make excuses for them.
That's why Nuremberg 2.0 is so important - they have to be exposed to a level that even wakes up the simps and tradcucks.
Based and soontoberemovedpilled
They could watch women sentence their friends to firing squad for "misogyny" and they'd still say that women are our allies.
Already kinda happened, the Afghans (a 'cisheteropatriarchal' culture if I've ever seen one) used homemade single-shot rifles as part of their arsenal in the wars against both the commie Soviets and American-led globohomo. They had previously used these jezails to great effect against the British...200 years ago.
The closest approximation I can think of is if a militia of American Christian nationalists were able to hold out against a vastly larger and better-equipped blue helmet occupying force for 20 years until the UN finally fucked off, despite having to wield M16s and Revolution-era Kentucky rifles against drones, jets, MOABs and the rest of today's cutting-edge arsenal in general.
I have never met a coal burner that wasn't mentally ill.
Celebrities, who gives a fuck what they say or think. There is more important shit going on in the world to pay attention to trash like this.
If this was Kanye talking about "muh joos", it'd be a top post.
I'll give you that actually. Women spewing hate for men is barely notable because they all do it.
For me, what made this interesting is that she didn't bury what they really want. She outright said she supports women killing men. Usually they try to hide it in softer wording, but not this time.
She's crazy no matter what.
Talks about how she might have a "gay bone" and might start dating women because she sucks at picking guys to be with.
Another dumb and vocal Hollywood broad with an effed up life, that can't accept personal responsibility or the consequences of her actions and decisions.
Your terms are acceptable. You have until midnight to fortify your positions.
It's less that it reveals the More Feminine Way agenda, and more that it shows us the incredible double-standard that exists that we all already knew about. Obviously a man couldn't say those things and get away with it.
Ah, a classic: https://youtu.be/LFlMoAasW4A?t=754
I only know about this automaton from joeybtoonz.
Makes you wonder if Kanye's little "noticing" phase is related. Gets the heat off women nicely.
A theory that really is building up in my head : "Noticers" are a More Feminine Way op.
Literally EVERYTHING is a more feminine way op to you.
It's weird that the noticers' new hero is tied to someone so radically in support of it.
He was...why would someone date a woman like this?
Well, you'd have to either admit that was true, which is a win for me, or admit it's strange, which is a win for me.
No, women gold dig frequently, they don't care who they're leeching off.
Nice female logic
Why would he care about taking the heat off his EX girlfriend?
You're an idiot. Why would he be "dating" someone like this?
That's not what I said. I asked how he could tolerate someone with these radical views.
It only makes sense if they were not actually in a relationship and she was some sort of handler.
He isn't dating her.