putin, a jew friend, declared on zelensky, a homo clown jew. both are blowing up the Whites in each other's countries, and the war is used as an excuse to drag down the standard of life in Europe. remember how the jews got flown out of ukraine right before the war? that can't be too far down the memoryhole.
there are no parallels to draw with WW2, where hitler ran out of novel ways to try to offer peace to everyone but the soviets, and before the war took its toll as war does germany was more or less a powerhouse of civilizational health.
reducing everything to "uhh they wuz all leftie" is both insanely false and shortsighted and it makes me think you're doing it on purpose, so i insist that you try to broaden your perspective here a little larger than just going "it had socialism in the name"
Socialism and fascism are authoritarian ideologies. Authoritarianism is leftist. Nazis being left-wing is not false, you do not know your history or understand political ideology if you believe otherwise.
You also entirely fail to understand my point through either ignorance or willful intellectual dishonesty.
Zelensky provoked conflict unnecessarily, for his own interests. Nothing he did was for the good of his people and it has resulted in mass Ukrainian casualties caused by a situation easily avoided.
Hitler provoked a conflict unnecessarily for his own interests. Starting WW2 was not a reasonable action. Germany was a strong economic power and aggressive military expansionism served his own psychoses, not the German people's best interest. It resulted in mass German casualties and the destruction of his people that continues to this day.
Drawing parallels between Weimar Germany and the current globalist left's social doctrine is reasonable. Simping for a psychotic leftist dictator just because he disposed of similar problems is not. Trying to ingratiate authoritarian leftists with right wing populism is actively poisonous, leftist infiltration tactics done by ignorant stormtroopers at the behest of sociopaths.
This parallels every major hard leftist organization. Ignorant stormtroopers get misled by sociopathic power grabbers.
In this case, it is the globalists controlling you. They want to use nazism as a propaganda tool against actual conservatives to destroy a populist nationalist movement, and discredit nationalism as an ideology. Nationalism was the only positive part of the nat-socs, and the reason for their success. You MUST understand, that just because they did one thing correct does not mean the rest of their ideology was correct. Extract the useful parts and discard the poisonous parts.
If you cannot parse this, and continue your blind servitude towards the propaganda aims of the globalists because you want to be owned by an authoritarian government, because you are at heart a peasant that wants a king, you are better off exiting stage left via your preferred method.
i cannot argue with you if the very premises you talk about as if they were reality are false and thoroughly poisoned in terminology. it would be as if we spoke to each other in different languages - i say "if a state must exist, it should act in favor of the people", you say "left-wing communist authoritarianism".
i say "zelensky is a jew sending Whites to die off in war", you compare him to hitler, who had to get through a hostile poland (to this day i don't get why, they were not jewish-controlled like the brits or americans and ended up losing a lot to communism after they fought for it) to start a war against the jewish soviets, then came the endless sidetracking after half the world declared. you also attribute germany's destruction post defeat to hitler... and not to the jews behind every attack on it? i am no feminist, but when a woman is raped, we punish the rapist before potentially telling the woman to dress better.
there are also talks that hitler didn't even want to declare on poland despite the looming soviet threat, especially considering that its previous leader had been such a dear respected friend to him that during the war he kept permanent honor guard at his grave in the occupied territory. instead things like the danzig massacre and the general tensions among the people following the unfavorable versailles treaty are said to have pushed him into war against poland, which would directly disprove your point that he acted against the people when it is possibly the people that made him act against his less warmongering will.
as for more domestic matters, if you subscribe to any hollywood views that gestapo visits and banned music genres were a regular occurrence and that if you wore blue on the purple shirt day they'd gas you, i shouldn't have to tell you that you shouldn't listen to hollywood.
furthermore if you take the very real restrictions on jews in germany as examples of authoritarianism, yet refuse to separate them from the germans in any way, well, you're just closing your eyes at that point...
putin, a jew friend, declared on zelensky, a homo clown jew. both are blowing up the Whites in each other's countries, and the war is used as an excuse to drag down the standard of life in Europe. remember how the jews got flown out of ukraine right before the war? that can't be too far down the memoryhole.
there are no parallels to draw with WW2, where hitler ran out of novel ways to try to offer peace to everyone but the soviets, and before the war took its toll as war does germany was more or less a powerhouse of civilizational health.
reducing everything to "uhh they wuz all leftie" is both insanely false and shortsighted and it makes me think you're doing it on purpose, so i insist that you try to broaden your perspective here a little larger than just going "it had socialism in the name"
Socialism and fascism are authoritarian ideologies. Authoritarianism is leftist. Nazis being left-wing is not false, you do not know your history or understand political ideology if you believe otherwise.
You also entirely fail to understand my point through either ignorance or willful intellectual dishonesty.
Zelensky provoked conflict unnecessarily, for his own interests. Nothing he did was for the good of his people and it has resulted in mass Ukrainian casualties caused by a situation easily avoided.
Hitler provoked a conflict unnecessarily for his own interests. Starting WW2 was not a reasonable action. Germany was a strong economic power and aggressive military expansionism served his own psychoses, not the German people's best interest. It resulted in mass German casualties and the destruction of his people that continues to this day.
Drawing parallels between Weimar Germany and the current globalist left's social doctrine is reasonable. Simping for a psychotic leftist dictator just because he disposed of similar problems is not. Trying to ingratiate authoritarian leftists with right wing populism is actively poisonous, leftist infiltration tactics done by ignorant stormtroopers at the behest of sociopaths.
This parallels every major hard leftist organization. Ignorant stormtroopers get misled by sociopathic power grabbers.
In this case, it is the globalists controlling you. They want to use nazism as a propaganda tool against actual conservatives to destroy a populist nationalist movement, and discredit nationalism as an ideology. Nationalism was the only positive part of the nat-socs, and the reason for their success. You MUST understand, that just because they did one thing correct does not mean the rest of their ideology was correct. Extract the useful parts and discard the poisonous parts.
If you cannot parse this, and continue your blind servitude towards the propaganda aims of the globalists because you want to be owned by an authoritarian government, because you are at heart a peasant that wants a king, you are better off exiting stage left via your preferred method.
i cannot argue with you if the very premises you talk about as if they were reality are false and thoroughly poisoned in terminology. it would be as if we spoke to each other in different languages - i say "if a state must exist, it should act in favor of the people", you say "left-wing communist authoritarianism".
i say "zelensky is a jew sending Whites to die off in war", you compare him to hitler, who had to get through a hostile poland (to this day i don't get why, they were not jewish-controlled like the brits or americans and ended up losing a lot to communism after they fought for it) to start a war against the jewish soviets, then came the endless sidetracking after half the world declared. you also attribute germany's destruction post defeat to hitler... and not to the jews behind every attack on it? i am no feminist, but when a woman is raped, we punish the rapist before potentially telling the woman to dress better.
there are also talks that hitler didn't even want to declare on poland despite the looming soviet threat, especially considering that its previous leader had been such a dear respected friend to him that during the war he kept permanent honor guard at his grave in the occupied territory. instead things like the danzig massacre and the general tensions among the people following the unfavorable versailles treaty are said to have pushed him into war against poland, which would directly disprove your point that he acted against the people when it is possibly the people that made him act against his less warmongering will.
as for more domestic matters, if you subscribe to any hollywood views that gestapo visits and banned music genres were a regular occurrence and that if you wore blue on the purple shirt day they'd gas you, i shouldn't have to tell you that you shouldn't listen to hollywood.
furthermore if you take the very real restrictions on jews in germany as examples of authoritarianism, yet refuse to separate them from the germans in any way, well, you're just closing your eyes at that point...