Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
So, as jews were being shoved into the room, their ability to resist further shoving
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Then, as they died, they would tumble in random positions, and then fall in an entangled morass. As such, the extraction of the dead would require chainsaws etc.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
You never fail to impress! You're wonderfully eloquent (I wish I could write half as well as you!) and you seem to know just about everything about... well everything. I keep meaning to ask you how to accurately compare 1M dollars from 1835 to now, 2022 -- the standard model of relating it to inflation of a basic food basket is obviously flawed beyond 20 years or so.
As to your criticisms... well, one place you fall apart is science -- which is odd, because you purport to have a physics (maybe?) degree. Well, I suppose all degrees are made differently. And, I suppose, that even physics degrees are more of an indication of an incapacity to think. My word! The things you say about climate and viruses...
So, having read some holocaust 'survivor' literature (Maus, say)... the jews "knew" that they were being gassed. The (obviously retarded) 'shower' story might have worked once... but not twice. Remember, the entry to the 'gas' chambers was in full view of... everyone.
Mass graves would obviously not lead to entanglement... because the people are dead.
Your assessment of the 'chambers' is flawed by not including the 6-8 steel columns (with 90 degree edges) required to maintain the fiction. These would obviously, given the pressure of the '2000' bodies, lead to mangle-ment. I do understand that pressure is one of the hardest concepts for 'physicists'. Much more so than 'quantum mechanics'.
Also, you, like all of the liars involved in the 'holocaust' (of which you're not one -- a liar, I mean), are not considering that all of the people have to be pulled out through 'one door'. This would obviously not be feasible using the 'canes' mentioned in Lanzman's documentary.
Ah! And the Germans, the most efficient people in history, just left 'eyewitnesses'. Right You can't possibly believe that.
Oh wait, you claim to be not an a-theist, but an anti-theist. You're neither. You're a Holocaustianist. You believe the stupidest story ever told -- including Hanuman and Ganesha. It's... astonishing.
And: Gizortnik: I obviously know what I'm talking about. I wish that either you or the jews would just do some 'experiments' (remember those -- the bedrock of 'science'?) instead of simply using your eloquence to confuse normies. Remember, an Australian literally used ground-penetrating radar to prove that no earth had been moved at Belzec. Then the jews destroyed his life and paved the entire ground with concrete, so that no such 'experiment' (remember those... from your 'education'?) could ever be done. Fantastic 'allies' you have!
Anyways, you're talking about a whole slew of shit I didn't say, which is weird.
I didn't analyze any chambers. Manglement isn't a word. I'm not a survivor of the holocaust. Yes, crimes have witnesses. Yes, the Germans documented the genocide. No ones talking about 'canes'.
So, like all holocaust believers, you know nothing about your chosen topic. That's fine, I'm Catholic, and know nothing about the Bible outside of the stories told to me as a child.
Canes are most definitely mentioned. You can even see the 'barber/actor' sweat as he freely invents the lie, on camera, in one of the most respected documentaries in history. He's also in the 'holocaust hall of fame' on the USC (I think) website. Remember, buddy: you purport to believe that the 'Nazis' got the Jews to use canes to drag the dead bodies out of the 'gas chamber'. But yes, I'm the weirdo.
'Manglement' is not a word -- that's why I used a hyphen, to underscore that I was neologizing. It's fairly standard practice. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are? (by the way, 'ones' in your last sentence needs an apostrophe -- kek!)
And no, the Germans did not document the 'genocide'. We literally have the Bletchley decodings of the Enigma machine, and they mention nothing other than (tragic) typhoid deaths.
Yes, they did document the genocide, not just decodings, but their actual liquidation orders and even the confessions of the killers themselves. Including the Camp Commandant of Autschwitz who specifically confessed, and pointed out that it was his job to improve it's efficiency compared to other camps.
Did you know that the entirety of the Nuremburg Trials transcripts are available online? You can actually go there.
Why did you attempt to write a letter?
Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
You may do so, but you'd be the first.
Dear Gizortnik,
You never fail to impress! You're wonderfully eloquent (I wish I could write half as well as you!) and you seem to know just about everything about... well everything. I keep meaning to ask you how to accurately compare 1M dollars from 1835 to now, 2022 -- the standard model of relating it to inflation of a basic food basket is obviously flawed beyond 20 years or so.
As to your criticisms... well, one place you fall apart is science -- which is odd, because you purport to have a physics (maybe?) degree. Well, I suppose all degrees are made differently. And, I suppose, that even physics degrees are more of an indication of an incapacity to think. My word! The things you say about climate and viruses...
So, having read some holocaust 'survivor' literature (Maus, say)... the jews "knew" that they were being gassed. The (obviously retarded) 'shower' story might have worked once... but not twice. Remember, the entry to the 'gas' chambers was in full view of... everyone.
Mass graves would obviously not lead to entanglement... because the people are dead.
Your assessment of the 'chambers' is flawed by not including the 6-8 steel columns (with 90 degree edges) required to maintain the fiction. These would obviously, given the pressure of the '2000' bodies, lead to mangle-ment. I do understand that pressure is one of the hardest concepts for 'physicists'. Much more so than 'quantum mechanics'.
Also, you, like all of the liars involved in the 'holocaust' (of which you're not one -- a liar, I mean), are not considering that all of the people have to be pulled out through 'one door'. This would obviously not be feasible using the 'canes' mentioned in Lanzman's documentary.
Ah! And the Germans, the most efficient people in history, just left 'eyewitnesses'. Right You can't possibly believe that.
Oh wait, you claim to be not an a-theist, but an anti-theist. You're neither. You're a Holocaustianist. You believe the stupidest story ever told -- including Hanuman and Ganesha. It's... astonishing.
And: Gizortnik: I obviously know what I'm talking about. I wish that either you or the jews would just do some 'experiments' (remember those -- the bedrock of 'science'?) instead of simply using your eloquence to confuse normies. Remember, an Australian literally used ground-penetrating radar to prove that no earth had been moved at Belzec. Then the jews destroyed his life and paved the entire ground with concrete, so that no such 'experiment' (remember those... from your 'education'?) could ever be done. Fantastic 'allies' you have!
Sincerely, DangerDog
Ok weirdo.
Anyways, you're talking about a whole slew of shit I didn't say, which is weird.
I didn't analyze any chambers. Manglement isn't a word. I'm not a survivor of the holocaust. Yes, crimes have witnesses. Yes, the Germans documented the genocide. No ones talking about 'canes'.
Gizortnik,
So, like all holocaust believers, you know nothing about your chosen topic. That's fine, I'm Catholic, and know nothing about the Bible outside of the stories told to me as a child.
Canes are most definitely mentioned. You can even see the 'barber/actor' sweat as he freely invents the lie, on camera, in one of the most respected documentaries in history. He's also in the 'holocaust hall of fame' on the USC (I think) website. Remember, buddy: you purport to believe that the 'Nazis' got the Jews to use canes to drag the dead bodies out of the 'gas chamber'. But yes, I'm the weirdo.
'Manglement' is not a word -- that's why I used a hyphen, to underscore that I was neologizing. It's fairly standard practice. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are? (by the way, 'ones' in your last sentence needs an apostrophe -- kek!)
And no, the Germans did not document the 'genocide'. We literally have the Bletchley decodings of the Enigma machine, and they mention nothing other than (tragic) typhoid deaths.
DangerDog
Yes, they did document the genocide, not just decodings, but their actual liquidation orders and even the confessions of the killers themselves. Including the Camp Commandant of Autschwitz who specifically confessed, and pointed out that it was his job to improve it's efficiency compared to other camps.
Did you know that the entirety of the Nuremburg Trials transcripts are available online? You can actually go there.