Okay. Let me pose these questions to you, and I'll preface it by saying that I've posed them to dozens of high-end engineers, and even the 75% that realized what game I was playing never had an answer.
So: According to canon, there was a place (Krema 3) in Auschwitz, where "2000" jews were gassed/incinerated -- the real number is probably 1250, but hey, jews are allowed all kinds of leeway. Let's say 2000, and then scale down as needed. The floor-plans of the rooms are readily available.
This brings up two questions:
There was only one door to the room. So, as jews were being shoved into the room, their ability to resist further shovings was being augmented. After about 100 jews were in the room, they would easily be able to resist any more jews being shoved in, because any force applied could only pass through the width of one door. (you'll have to think a bit about this, but eventually it's very obvious)
Ah yes -- guns! But any gunshot would lead to mass panic, and, as there were no turrets (in the enclosed Krema spaces), there would be no way to stop the mass panic/trampling that would obviously occur.
Pre-suppose that 2000 (1250) jews just walked passively into a room, and lined up passively to be killed. Okay, as the gas starts to enter the room, the people at the front would, naturally, push toward the door. Then, as they died, they would tumble in random positions, and then fall in an entangled morass. As such, the extraction of the dead would require chainsaws etc. Something not evidenced in any eye-witness testimony.
Okay: so keep in mind that there is no 'bamboozle' here. This is all simply basic engineering. If I were wrong, literal children could contradict me, and I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
Can you, Gizortnik, with your obvious 145+ IQ tell me my errors? Or do you just ignore this?
Remember: if the holocaust could not have happened... then it didn't.
Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
So, as jews were being shoved into the room, their ability to resist further shoving
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Then, as they died, they would tumble in random positions, and then fall in an entangled morass. As such, the extraction of the dead would require chainsaws etc.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
You never fail to impress! You're wonderfully eloquent (I wish I could write half as well as you!) and you seem to know just about everything about... well everything. I keep meaning to ask you how to accurately compare 1M dollars from 1835 to now, 2022 -- the standard model of relating it to inflation of a basic food basket is obviously flawed beyond 20 years or so.
As to your criticisms... well, one place you fall apart is science -- which is odd, because you purport to have a physics (maybe?) degree. Well, I suppose all degrees are made differently. And, I suppose, that even physics degrees are more of an indication of an incapacity to think. My word! The things you say about climate and viruses...
So, having read some holocaust 'survivor' literature (Maus, say)... the jews "knew" that they were being gassed. The (obviously retarded) 'shower' story might have worked once... but not twice. Remember, the entry to the 'gas' chambers was in full view of... everyone.
Mass graves would obviously not lead to entanglement... because the people are dead.
Your assessment of the 'chambers' is flawed by not including the 6-8 steel columns (with 90 degree edges) required to maintain the fiction. These would obviously, given the pressure of the '2000' bodies, lead to mangle-ment. I do understand that pressure is one of the hardest concepts for 'physicists'. Much more so than 'quantum mechanics'.
Also, you, like all of the liars involved in the 'holocaust' (of which you're not one -- a liar, I mean), are not considering that all of the people have to be pulled out through 'one door'. This would obviously not be feasible using the 'canes' mentioned in Lanzman's documentary.
Ah! And the Germans, the most efficient people in history, just left 'eyewitnesses'. Right You can't possibly believe that.
Oh wait, you claim to be not an a-theist, but an anti-theist. You're neither. You're a Holocaustianist. You believe the stupidest story ever told -- including Hanuman and Ganesha. It's... astonishing.
And: Gizortnik: I obviously know what I'm talking about. I wish that either you or the jews would just do some 'experiments' (remember those -- the bedrock of 'science'?) instead of simply using your eloquence to confuse normies. Remember, an Australian literally used ground-penetrating radar to prove that no earth had been moved at Belzec. Then the jews destroyed his life and paved the entire ground with concrete, so that no such 'experiment' (remember those... from your 'education'?) could ever be done. Fantastic 'allies' you have!
Anyways, you're talking about a whole slew of shit I didn't say, which is weird.
I didn't analyze any chambers. Manglement isn't a word. I'm not a survivor of the holocaust. Yes, crimes have witnesses. Yes, the Germans documented the genocide. No ones talking about 'canes'.
All I have to do is look at the evidence, and the shit that Hitler said and did.
Ah, evidence.
Okay. Let me pose these questions to you, and I'll preface it by saying that I've posed them to dozens of high-end engineers, and even the 75% that realized what game I was playing never had an answer.
So: According to canon, there was a place (Krema 3) in Auschwitz, where "2000" jews were gassed/incinerated -- the real number is probably 1250, but hey, jews are allowed all kinds of leeway. Let's say 2000, and then scale down as needed. The floor-plans of the rooms are readily available.
This brings up two questions:
Ah yes -- guns! But any gunshot would lead to mass panic, and, as there were no turrets (in the enclosed Krema spaces), there would be no way to stop the mass panic/trampling that would obviously occur.
Okay: so keep in mind that there is no 'bamboozle' here. This is all simply basic engineering. If I were wrong, literal children could contradict me, and I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
Can you, Gizortnik, with your obvious 145+ IQ tell me my errors? Or do you just ignore this?
Remember: if the holocaust could not have happened... then it didn't.
Sincerely, Danger Dog
Why did you attempt to write a letter?
Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
You may do so, but you'd be the first.
Dear Gizortnik,
You never fail to impress! You're wonderfully eloquent (I wish I could write half as well as you!) and you seem to know just about everything about... well everything. I keep meaning to ask you how to accurately compare 1M dollars from 1835 to now, 2022 -- the standard model of relating it to inflation of a basic food basket is obviously flawed beyond 20 years or so.
As to your criticisms... well, one place you fall apart is science -- which is odd, because you purport to have a physics (maybe?) degree. Well, I suppose all degrees are made differently. And, I suppose, that even physics degrees are more of an indication of an incapacity to think. My word! The things you say about climate and viruses...
So, having read some holocaust 'survivor' literature (Maus, say)... the jews "knew" that they were being gassed. The (obviously retarded) 'shower' story might have worked once... but not twice. Remember, the entry to the 'gas' chambers was in full view of... everyone.
Mass graves would obviously not lead to entanglement... because the people are dead.
Your assessment of the 'chambers' is flawed by not including the 6-8 steel columns (with 90 degree edges) required to maintain the fiction. These would obviously, given the pressure of the '2000' bodies, lead to mangle-ment. I do understand that pressure is one of the hardest concepts for 'physicists'. Much more so than 'quantum mechanics'.
Also, you, like all of the liars involved in the 'holocaust' (of which you're not one -- a liar, I mean), are not considering that all of the people have to be pulled out through 'one door'. This would obviously not be feasible using the 'canes' mentioned in Lanzman's documentary.
Ah! And the Germans, the most efficient people in history, just left 'eyewitnesses'. Right You can't possibly believe that.
Oh wait, you claim to be not an a-theist, but an anti-theist. You're neither. You're a Holocaustianist. You believe the stupidest story ever told -- including Hanuman and Ganesha. It's... astonishing.
And: Gizortnik: I obviously know what I'm talking about. I wish that either you or the jews would just do some 'experiments' (remember those -- the bedrock of 'science'?) instead of simply using your eloquence to confuse normies. Remember, an Australian literally used ground-penetrating radar to prove that no earth had been moved at Belzec. Then the jews destroyed his life and paved the entire ground with concrete, so that no such 'experiment' (remember those... from your 'education'?) could ever be done. Fantastic 'allies' you have!
Sincerely, DangerDog
Ok weirdo.
Anyways, you're talking about a whole slew of shit I didn't say, which is weird.
I didn't analyze any chambers. Manglement isn't a word. I'm not a survivor of the holocaust. Yes, crimes have witnesses. Yes, the Germans documented the genocide. No ones talking about 'canes'.