You accept that the elite are evil, and when faced with what little free will you have left, you choose not to avoid picking evil, but explicitly go out of your way to pick evil of your flavour and then condemn others that want to stop picking evil.
You attribute many things to me that I haven't said. My point is that government will always be created if it doesn't exist. There will always be a government.
Define government and then give the difference between a government and an organisation.
There will always be organisation and collaboration. There does not need to be an entity that forces itself upon people without their consent, as it steals the fruits of their labour (taxes) to keep itself alive.
I haven't said
You don't have to. Statists are predictable, namely because I was in your shoes once and because you refuse to listen to answers that anarchists give any time any of these questions are asked. People like you love to go on and on about "well what about this issue, anarchists don't talk about this", when it's one of the main points that gets spoken about for nearly a century at this point.
There are two main statist groups. The naive, who believe they can harness the evil for good, and the nihilistic, the ones that give up because "it will always happen". Society trends towards authoritarianism as time goes on, gonna go and advocate for that in your cowardly defeatism? Or do you think that maybe striving for freedom is the moral choice?
You attribute many things to me that I haven't said. My point is that government will always be created if it doesn't exist. There will always be a government.
Define government and then give the difference between a government and an organisation.
There will always be organisation and collaboration. There does not need to be an entity that forces itself upon people without their consent, as it steals the fruits of their labour (taxes) to keep itself alive.
You don't have to. Statists are predictable, namely because I was in your shoes once and because you refuse to listen to answers that anarchists give any time any of these questions are asked. People like you love to go on and on about "well what about this issue, anarchists don't talk about this", when it's one of the main points that gets spoken about for nearly a century at this point.
There are two main statist groups. The naive, who believe they can harness the evil for good, and the nihilistic, the ones that give up because "it will always happen". Society trends towards authoritarianism as time goes on, gonna go and advocate for that in your cowardly defeatism? Or do you think that maybe striving for freedom is the moral choice?
Whatever, dude.
Wanted a last word, but had nothing to actually say? Just take the L, statist.