We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
Here's the thing. Identity Politics IS a bad thing. It's like political violence, in a perfect world, it shouldn't be used.
The problem lies in the fact that white-people endlessly give the benefit of the doubt and try to take the higher ground approach.
It's like being in a back-alley knife fight and critiquing your enemies form.
It unfortunately hasn't settled in yet to most of the masses that this ideological warfare is actually warfare. It sounds silly to say it but they aren't playing a political game, they are playing for keeps.
When you live in a safe and secure neighborhood, you don’t need a gun to protect your home.
Likewise, when you live in an ethnically homogeneous nation with a unified culture and heritage, you don’t need identity politics to protect your people.
In both cases, a potentially violent tool of intervention only becomes necessary when the environment demands it. The blame for what happens next lies not with the tool but rather with the people who altered the environment to become threatening in the first place.
In other words: the anti-idpol crowd are the equivalent of gun control advocates. They believe that political violence will cease when the people who use idpol to defend themselves put down those ugly tools - while the criminal aggressors continue to use them.
Except you always need a gun to protect you because criminals come to your home.
Giving the government powers to ethnically regulate society is pointing that gun at yourself and firing.
The state does not represent the people, and it sure as fuck can't be trusted with being the ethnic representation of a people, because the first thing it will do is turn around and go "you're not a true scottsman" and start shooting it's own constituency. There is no point where anything will be homogeneous enough, and no point where identity will be unified enough, because you will act as race traitors immediately to secure power for your selves and your own personal understanding of what your people are.
That would require leaving the house so probably not.
I lived in a majority white small town in England for most of my early life.
I still don't think we ever didn't worry about locking the front door. That's just a common sense thing, not a race thing.
I tend to think a nation is no longer entitled to ethnic homogeneity when it forcibly imports ten percent of its population, even as slaves, from across the ocean. So yeah, not a “stormfag”.
This doesn’t prevent me from recognizing a fundamental truth: diversity + proximity = war. That war will be fought with idpol, guns, or both. Anyone who doesn’t arm themselves will be slaughtered.
In America, the war began in 1964 with the passage of the civil rights act, which is a de facto replacement for the constitution. This was followed by Hart-Cellar opening the immigration floodgates. In the half century since, America has gone from 90% euro white to 60%. This is demographic shift on par with genocide.
There is no going back. It’s over. America will be a multicultural society from now until the day it inevitably collapses. Without shared heritage, culture, and values, our society will be governed by intertribal strife.
None of this is “white supremacy”. It’s just the way the world works.
Notice you said "on par with" rather than actually saying genocide. Even you know the idea of "white genocide" sounds stupid.
There's more evidence of male genocide, with the constantly increasing male suicide rate and decreasing labor force participation in the last 30 years.
I have come to the conclusion that you are acting in bad faith.
It's like complaining about bad weather. It may be true, but it's a fact of life. It's something you have to deal with. White people can't be the only fucking idiots sitting on the bench while everyone else plays for their team. That's how you get blown out.
White people are fighting on their own teams. Those teams just aren't some weird racial block since "white" isn't an ethnic group, we all have our own interests, and racializing ourselves into this socialist political bloc you want is stupid.
That's why we're losing.
On the contrary. Racialism fundamentally homogenizes the differences between ethnic groups, and eradicates them to serve a larger racial narrative, normally espoused by intellectuals, who assert some racial character that exists only in their mind.
All of the ethnic distinctions within that racial group are paved over to serve Socialism, and anyone not fitting the Socialist's order are attacked.
The rejection of those racial narratives is what allows ethnic groups to survive a Socialist onslaught by people claiming to represent their interests.
This is why American blacks believe in racialist nonsense like Wakanda and Kwanza, when real Africans actually have an actual ethnic history and culture to fall-back on; and why there is extreme tension between American blacks, Africans, Caribbean blacks, and Brazilian blacks. American blacks are heavily socialized and are blotting over their real history and culture by plastering pictures of Hollywood actors and Fentanyl users everywhere.
What fucking team? White women long left your team to join Team Women, and they're reaping the benefits of that while you do your oy veys and your "jogger" crap.
The only people on Team White are white men, so why can't it be Team Men and have a better chance of winning anything?
The number one team you have to beat is Team Women, and you haven't even acknowledged their existence.
The one that brought where we were before critical levels of poz began metastasizing around the 1960s
We've already been over this countless times. Repeat after me: "White women are the second most right-wing demographic in the country behind only white men."
Would be extinct in a generation
What alternate history bullshit are you on? You've never been unified, other than when the situation forced it, and even after that, they knifed you in the back as soon as they had the chance. For example, women campaigned alongside the KKK to oppose the black vote. They convinced you of the "snow under" strategy of letting white women vote. How did that one go for you?
That is getting closer and closer to being a false statement, and I can't wait for it to be one. I explained about ages, about how every other demographic is moving right while they move left, but it doesn't seem to stick in your head.
Maybe I should try a different approach.
White women are your version of the neocons' obsession with Israel. They're your "greatest ally".
I've said for years that any ideology that doesn't account for and guard against bad faith is not one that will survive. That includes libertarians and so called conservatives.