We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
It's like complaining about bad weather. It may be true, but it's a fact of life. It's something you have to deal with. White people can't be the only fucking idiots sitting on the bench while everyone else plays for their team. That's how you get blown out.
White people are fighting on their own teams. Those teams just aren't some weird racial block since "white" isn't an ethnic group, we all have our own interests, and racializing ourselves into this socialist political bloc you want is stupid.
That's why we're losing.
On the contrary. Racialism fundamentally homogenizes the differences between ethnic groups, and eradicates them to serve a larger racial narrative, normally espoused by intellectuals, who assert some racial character that exists only in their mind.
All of the ethnic distinctions within that racial group are paved over to serve Socialism, and anyone not fitting the Socialist's order are attacked.
The rejection of those racial narratives is what allows ethnic groups to survive a Socialist onslaught by people claiming to represent their interests.
This is why American blacks believe in racialist nonsense like Wakanda and Kwanza, when real Africans actually have an actual ethnic history and culture to fall-back on; and why there is extreme tension between American blacks, Africans, Caribbean blacks, and Brazilian blacks. American blacks are heavily socialized and are blotting over their real history and culture by plastering pictures of Hollywood actors and Fentanyl users everywhere.
What fucking team? White women long left your team to join Team Women, and they're reaping the benefits of that while you do your oy veys and your "jogger" crap.
The only people on Team White are white men, so why can't it be Team Men and have a better chance of winning anything?
The number one team you have to beat is Team Women, and you haven't even acknowledged their existence.
The one that brought where we were before critical levels of poz began metastasizing around the 1960s
We've already been over this countless times. Repeat after me: "White women are the second most right-wing demographic in the country behind only white men."
Would be extinct in a generation
What alternate history bullshit are you on? You've never been unified, other than when the situation forced it, and even after that, they knifed you in the back as soon as they had the chance. For example, women campaigned alongside the KKK to oppose the black vote. They convinced you of the "snow under" strategy of letting white women vote. How did that one go for you?
That is getting closer and closer to being a false statement, and I can't wait for it to be one. I explained about ages, about how every other demographic is moving right while they move left, but it doesn't seem to stick in your head.
Maybe I should try a different approach.
White women are your version of the neocons' obsession with Israel. They're your "greatest ally".
Voting is kinda gay in general, but White women have a far better voting track record than black men. I've already explained to you that even if you get your wish, and they some day move further left than minority men, that would be an outlier of history so it's a stretch to attribute it to essentialism rather than the political climate at the time. I'm sure the system would love a gender divide over a white identity movement since the latter is the one that is actually a threat. I won't be surprised to see the system attempt to draw radicalizing white men until male identity instead of white identity. Fake radicals like Milo are already doing that.
What your dementia-addled brain can't understand is that the voting divides between whites and POCs are just one small piece of a larger puzzle that includes things like racial differences in IQ and the millennia of history between Jews and European gentiles. You're trying to arguing that trends that are at best emergent only in the advanced stages of pozzification somehow represent an eternal political conflict.
When you do attempt to draw from history, you end up making utterly moronic claims like Peggy McIntosh inventing racial politics in the 1980s or just denying history that contradicts your world view, like that of the tranny movement.