We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
That would require leaving the house so probably not.
I lived in a majority white small town in England for most of my early life.
I still don't think we ever didn't worry about locking the front door. That's just a common sense thing, not a race thing.
OMG you're a britbong, that makes so much more sense.
I don't live there anymore.
I tend to think a nation is no longer entitled to ethnic homogeneity when it forcibly imports ten percent of its population, even as slaves, from across the ocean. So yeah, not a “stormfag”.
This doesn’t prevent me from recognizing a fundamental truth: diversity + proximity = war. That war will be fought with idpol, guns, or both. Anyone who doesn’t arm themselves will be slaughtered.
In America, the war began in 1964 with the passage of the civil rights act, which is a de facto replacement for the constitution. This was followed by Hart-Cellar opening the immigration floodgates. In the half century since, America has gone from 90% euro white to 60%. This is demographic shift on par with genocide.
There is no going back. It’s over. America will be a multicultural society from now until the day it inevitably collapses. Without shared heritage, culture, and values, our society will be governed by intertribal strife.
None of this is “white supremacy”. It’s just the way the world works.
Notice you said "on par with" rather than actually saying genocide. Even you know the idea of "white genocide" sounds stupid.
There's more evidence of male genocide, with the constantly increasing male suicide rate and decreasing labor force participation in the last 30 years.
I have come to the conclusion that you are acting in bad faith.