Despite Impy's best effort, this is actually a hyper important point.
Marriage is one of the single largest factors in determining whether a woman is left or right. The statistic I saw once was:
Unmarried women: Staunch Left
Married women: Moderate Right
Divorced women: Moderate Left
2nd Marriage women: Lean Right
2nd Divorced women: Lean Left
3rd Married women: Right of Center
3rd Divorce women: Lean Left
4th Married women: Right of Center
I'm going to try and explain this in as short and simple a manner as I can:
This is the result of the state using hypergamy and dependency systems as a way of destroying the family, and fundamentally emasculating men. Women need men to protect and provide for them. When they are with a man, they can influence him, and they support governance that reinforces his ability to be a provider and protector (never full-throat libertarian independent, because that actually conflicts with the average woman's sensibility towards care). When they don't have a man, they turn to the state to take his place as protector and provider; and the state is only happy to provide.
The state (indeed all authoritarians) seek to cuck men of their women as a way of securing their own power and status. If the population of men under the rule of the authoritarian are independent, stoic, and self-providing; their utility for women is vastly more accessible outside the hypergamic harem of the authoritarian. Emasculating men keeps women coming back to the government, and women who feel vulnerable without a man seek the government's protection as a supplement.
an ungrateful parasite who thinks they are superior.
Stop dating leftists, impy.
But they don't. They are capable of work. They just don't want to do anything because they are lazy and self-obsessed, believing everything should be handed to them.
You're getting every part of this confused. Women do need men as provider and protector. A good man is like a literal walking super-soldier to women. His agency is his value. A woman can protect herself (but not as well as a man can). A woman can provide for herself (but not as well as a man can).
In order to keep a man, a woman has additional responsibilities that do not involve being a pretty sex doll; but involve what used to be called "women's work". Building and maintaining the aesthetics of a home, building a family, building a community. Doing most of the social navigating and construction. The responsibility of a woman is for her to heal and inspire him into doing all that providing and protecting.
Now I grant you that none of our "I'm the table" modern women fall into that, but that is because of the prevalence of Leftism in our degenerated society.
we all have to chained to them to prevent 1984, but that's a life of misery nobody wants
Lots of men want women. Particularly good women that we have a shortage of, and what I described is what a ton of men want.
so we are left in a perpetual war that nobody is willing to escalate beyond vague comments to actually calling them out publicly.
Despite Impy's best effort, this is actually a hyper important point.
Marriage is one of the single largest factors in determining whether a woman is left or right. The statistic I saw once was:
I'm going to try and explain this in as short and simple a manner as I can:
This is the result of the state using hypergamy and dependency systems as a way of destroying the family, and fundamentally emasculating men. Women need men to protect and provide for them. When they are with a man, they can influence him, and they support governance that reinforces his ability to be a provider and protector (never full-throat libertarian independent, because that actually conflicts with the average woman's sensibility towards care). When they don't have a man, they turn to the state to take his place as protector and provider; and the state is only happy to provide.
The state (indeed all authoritarians) seek to cuck men of their women as a way of securing their own power and status. If the population of men under the rule of the authoritarian are independent, stoic, and self-providing; their utility for women is vastly more accessible outside the hypergamic harem of the authoritarian. Emasculating men keeps women coming back to the government, and women who feel vulnerable without a man seek the government's protection as a supplement.
Stop dating leftists, impy.
You're getting every part of this confused. Women do need men as provider and protector. A good man is like a literal walking super-soldier to women. His agency is his value. A woman can protect herself (but not as well as a man can). A woman can provide for herself (but not as well as a man can).
In order to keep a man, a woman has additional responsibilities that do not involve being a pretty sex doll; but involve what used to be called "women's work". Building and maintaining the aesthetics of a home, building a family, building a community. Doing most of the social navigating and construction. The responsibility of a woman is for her to heal and inspire him into doing all that providing and protecting.
Now I grant you that none of our "I'm the table" modern women fall into that, but that is because of the prevalence of Leftism in our degenerated society.
Lots of men want women. Particularly good women that we have a shortage of, and what I described is what a ton of men want.
That's Feminist rhetoric and you know it.