You are a fucking retard for taking the vaccine. I'd call you that even if it did do what it was purported to, which we all know now is untrue, and if it had zero side effects
Okay Tony, you win. I'm not going through a year's worth of your lover's quarrels with Imp to pull receipts on you advocating for the vax so you can squirm out of it with some duplicitous pilpul. You have never said verbatim "Guys take this untested vaccine". I thought you were intelligent enough to understand that was writing in long form what is implied when you advocate taking the fauci ouchie. Vax must've addled your brains.
It's not untested
In terms of medical procedures? It certainly is. Show me the 10 year trial data
So you just spew crap with absolutely nothing to back it up?
You have never said verbatim "Guys take this untested vaccine". I thought you were intelligent enough to understand that was writing in long form what is implied when you advocate taking the fauci ouchie.
Problem is, I didn't "advocate" anything. But since you just make up stuff out of whole cloth, you probably don't care about the truth.
What I've said is that the vaccine is useful for people who are at risk. If you're 70+, morbidly obese (maybe that is why you as an American thought I was 'advocating for it', since you all are), then yes, the benefits do outweigh the risks.
And you're a retard if you hold otherwise. So yeah, I stand by everything I said. It has held up quite well.
That's why you can't produce any receipts for what you claimed I said.
In terms of medical procedures? It certainly is. Show me the 10 year trial data
Looks like another fake quote.
But this one I'd actually endorse. You can't call it "untested" nor "tested". It's in the middle. The amount of risk that one would accept from the vaccine is related to the amount of protection it's supposed to provide. So for 16-year-olds, who are basically not at risk from the virus, it'd have to be very safe - but for 80-year-olds, it might be worth recommending even if it has significant risks.
But go ahead and dismiss any nuanced position as "LEWLZ ADVOCATING FOR DA VACCINE". As if it's by definition a bad thing.
You are a fucking retard for taking the vaccine. I'd call you that even if it did do what it was purported to, which we all know now is untrue, and if it had zero side effects
Alright, you still have no receipts for your claim that I said:
So you made it up, you know you made it up, and now it's obvious.
Okay Tony, you win. I'm not going through a year's worth of your lover's quarrels with Imp to pull receipts on you advocating for the vax so you can squirm out of it with some duplicitous pilpul. You have never said verbatim "Guys take this untested vaccine". I thought you were intelligent enough to understand that was writing in long form what is implied when you advocate taking the fauci ouchie. Vax must've addled your brains.
In terms of medical procedures? It certainly is. Show me the 10 year trial data
So you just spew crap with absolutely nothing to back it up?
Problem is, I didn't "advocate" anything. But since you just make up stuff out of whole cloth, you probably don't care about the truth.
What I've said is that the vaccine is useful for people who are at risk. If you're 70+, morbidly obese (maybe that is why you as an American thought I was 'advocating for it', since you all are), then yes, the benefits do outweigh the risks.
And you're a retard if you hold otherwise. So yeah, I stand by everything I said. It has held up quite well.
That's why you can't produce any receipts for what you claimed I said.
Looks like another fake quote.
But this one I'd actually endorse. You can't call it "untested" nor "tested". It's in the middle. The amount of risk that one would accept from the vaccine is related to the amount of protection it's supposed to provide. So for 16-year-olds, who are basically not at risk from the virus, it'd have to be very safe - but for 80-year-olds, it might be worth recommending even if it has significant risks.
But go ahead and dismiss any nuanced position as "LEWLZ ADVOCATING FOR DA VACCINE". As if it's by definition a bad thing.