Not that strange. Aside from Trump, most Republicans are tradcons who think men don't deserve help and women are more useful, so their support is directed towards "the poor girls" who have their male privilege check bounce.
Objectively true. Just about every Republican I know, especially the older ones, are the "women shouldn't suffer consequences ever" types. Anything bad that happens to a woman is because society is evil and hates women. Anything good that happens to a woman is because she's a strong queen who's slayin' it.
If there's one thing both sides can agree on, it's gynocentrism.
It makes me sick that they care so much for the young women who heard about male privilege and thought "I want that!" rather than the victims of women's clear and obvious hatred.
And I wouldn't say they represent conservative anything. They are basically apologists for leftists. "Oh so sorry that the ebil paleos are naming you. Real (tm) conservatives love Israel"
That would explain why they unironically referred to the Brookings Institute, a Melinda Gates funded thinktank that exists purely to direct tradcons away from blaming women like her.
Fourth. I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop" (because they're not behind the girls enough...)
That was just obfuscation of the now confirmed open discrimination against boys in the schools.
I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
You're mad because there was a child support plan that didn't include a requirement for paternity tests?
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop"
I'm not taking a position one way or the other - though my position is probably closer to yours.
I'm just saying that the Imp is batshit crazy for denouncing a reform proposal which he has not read because it does not include something that he would like to see.
The whole article is just a thin defence of the teaching profession that suggested they aren't to blame for boys doing worse, which aged like fucking milk when an Italian study confirmed that yes, teachers do openly and consciously discriminate against boys.
didn't know the jidf hired children... man, what do they do to you there? nevermind, i don't care
After all, you don't believe that women can be bad people.
and you regularly advocate for septic tank bathing
wait, we're not playing two truths and a lie or something, right?
I'm sure you could point to some of this "women hatred", so I can laugh at how pathetic your examples are.
if you think the aforementioned landwhale dyke whores are totally living it up to their fullest at the expense of men you should probably follow in their footsteps and die of heart disease or something
actually you probably already are following the whole landwhale thing
healthy at any weight is directly destructive to mainly women since they seem to have the highest propensity to get fat
promoting whoredom is destructive to men and women equally since neither end up happy
the neurotic social media state we live in affects women the most since they are most emotional and affected by perceived social standing, leading to many of them becoming nervous wrecks
the LG TV movement: feminine men's genelines are doomed, masculine women's lines the same
the effects you keep rattling on about for your 0.12 shekels per post are simply the powers that shouldn't be seeking, truthfully, mainly, to destroy our men, because those are most likely to actually rise up and hang them. women ultimately conform even to the highest evils since it is in their blood to do so and require less overt destruction - it doesn't matter if they're poor, rich, ostracized or popular, when another White Genocidal law comes into effect, the women are just gonna shrug without any men around to tell them how dire it is.
but White (and other races too ultimately, but first and foremost this one which is ours) men and women suffer equally. neither are happy. the smile of the modern woman means as much as the smile of the modern soyboy holding his nindendi switchy, no matter how many dollars per month she gets from her divorced husband to spend on makeup.
"They want to know what it's like to have control over something that's controlled by an unlikable creature" - Patrice Oneal
I believe there's a correlation absolutely. The scariest aspect are the ones claiming trans identity specifically out of awareness for how it insulates you from any backlash for your actions in clown world.
How about you show me your claim that "Women's response to the masculinity crisis is one of contempt and derision".
Thank you.
Also, how come the Brookings Institute funded by the GENOCIDAL WOMANING Melinda Gates is complaining about a 'male college crisis' because of men's underrepresentation in college?
Wait, wait, let me guess. They want more men in college so they can impose the mandate for the vaccine created by womens to kill men! Ingenious.
Women need successful men to fulfill their purpose as Hirudo medicinalis.
LOL! It takes nerve to argue simultaneously "WOMEN ARE ROOTING FOR MALE SUCCESS!" AND "WOMEN WANT TO KILL US" and "WOMEN SABOTAGE BOYS' EDUCATION".
You are literally insane.
Colleges control who they admit, they're gaining credibility from shouting into a void
So first you claim that The Federalist is bad because it mentioned Brookings, even though Brookings is defending boys. How can you even live with such insanity and cognitive disosnance?
You should make this into a full post, it deserves to be seen by more people than it will as a comment.
Not that strange. Aside from Trump, most Republicans are tradcons who think men don't deserve help and women are more useful, so their support is directed towards "the poor girls" who have their male privilege check bounce.
Objectively true. Just about every Republican I know, especially the older ones, are the "women shouldn't suffer consequences ever" types. Anything bad that happens to a woman is because society is evil and hates women. Anything good that happens to a woman is because she's a strong queen who's slayin' it.
If there's one thing both sides can agree on, it's gynocentrism.
It makes me sick that they care so much for the young women who heard about male privilege and thought "I want that!" rather than the victims of women's clear and obvious hatred.
Huh, an unarchived link to a media source with a scary woman Editor-in-Chief?
Didn't know you to go so easy on people who want you tortured, killed and then laugh while you lie dying...
Federalist got jewed a while ago
And I wouldn't say they represent conservative anything. They are basically apologists for leftists. "Oh so sorry that the ebil paleos are naming you. Real (tm) conservatives love Israel"
Excuse me?
Yeah, they do.
That would explain why they unironically referred to the Brookings Institute, a Melinda Gates funded thinktank that exists purely to direct tradcons away from blaming women like her.
Noted, I'll delete and archive for reposting.
Is this the first time you have heard about the Brookings Institute?
Fourth. I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop" (because they're not behind the girls enough...)
That was just obfuscation of the now confirmed open discrimination against boys in the schools.
You're mad because there was a child support plan that didn't include a requirement for paternity tests?
I'm sure that definitely happened.
I'm not taking a position one way or the other - though my position is probably closer to yours.
I'm just saying that the Imp is batshit crazy for denouncing a reform proposal which he has not read because it does not include something that he would like to see.
Just the voice of experience. He makes all sorts of crazy claims.
https://archive.ph/NLaDG
It's real.
Yes. It's literally the bare minimum to reform it, to ensure nobody's stuck providing for someone else's child.
I always have the archives. Notice where he published it? There's the link to the Silicon Valley whore brigade again.
The whole article is just a thin defence of the teaching profession that suggested they aren't to blame for boys doing worse, which aged like fucking milk when an Italian study confirmed that yes, teachers do openly and consciously discriminate against boys.
So no comment on the rest of the plan? Did you even read it? You're just throwing a tantrum because it didn't include what you wanted.
Stop making archives using bad URLs, dumbass, that can be used to track you down.
The reason little boys wear almost all of the red shirts is not mysterious; the fact that boys mature later than girls is one known to every parent
Based on what?
Even if replicated, it would not automatically explain why boys do worse, dumbass.
Do I need to? Anything that doesn't include stopping paternity fraud is just another handout to the worse halves.
Not my archive. I just had the link to it. Someone else used that Google link.
Based on this lunacy that if boys start later, they do better. It's not a solution, it's a cover up of the real problem.
It really does explain it. It means that teachers refuse to let them achieve.
nobody tell him the rise in landwhale dyke whores is due to (((left-wing))) hatred of women too...
Maybe in your stupid stormcuck heads.
After all, you don't believe that women can be bad people.
I'm sure you could point to some of this "women hatred", so I can laugh at how pathetic your examples are.
didn't know the jidf hired children... man, what do they do to you there? nevermind, i don't care
and you regularly advocate for septic tank bathing
wait, we're not playing two truths and a lie or something, right?
if you think the aforementioned landwhale dyke whores are totally living it up to their fullest at the expense of men you should probably follow in their footsteps and die of heart disease or something
actually you probably already are following the whole landwhale thing
Ad hominems are not a substitute for evidence. Could you not find a single mainstream example of anti-woman speech?
That's so strange. I wonder why...
You,
Also you,
healthy at any weight is directly destructive to mainly women since they seem to have the highest propensity to get fat
promoting whoredom is destructive to men and women equally since neither end up happy
the neurotic social media state we live in affects women the most since they are most emotional and affected by perceived social standing, leading to many of them becoming nervous wrecks
the LG TV movement: feminine men's genelines are doomed, masculine women's lines the same
the effects you keep rattling on about for your 0.12 shekels per post are simply the powers that shouldn't be seeking, truthfully, mainly, to destroy our men, because those are most likely to actually rise up and hang them. women ultimately conform even to the highest evils since it is in their blood to do so and require less overt destruction - it doesn't matter if they're poor, rich, ostracized or popular, when another White Genocidal law comes into effect, the women are just gonna shrug without any men around to tell them how dire it is.
but White (and other races too ultimately, but first and foremost this one which is ours) men and women suffer equally. neither are happy. the smile of the modern woman means as much as the smile of the modern soyboy holding his nindendi switchy, no matter how many dollars per month she gets from her divorced husband to spend on makeup.
Still no actual evidence, just whining about their movements backfiring on them.
I can produce enough evidence of hate against men to fill the word count here, you can't even produce one link.
i-it's just backfiring!!!
pathetic
Produce a link. Produce some kind of evidence that mainstream hatred of women exists.
There's nothing and you know it.
I believe there's a correlation absolutely. The scariest aspect are the ones claiming trans identity specifically out of awareness for how it insulates you from any backlash for your actions in clown world.
Archive Link
Next step - #YesAllWomen
Yes all women what?
Yup, it's all women's fault.
Such a whiny little prick, and that without even having a real prick.
I mean...who do you think these corporates and politicians are trying to gain support from by attacking men?
How about you show me your claim that "Women's response to the masculinity crisis is one of contempt and derision".
Thank you.
Also, how come the Brookings Institute funded by the GENOCIDAL WOMANING Melinda Gates is complaining about a 'male college crisis' because of men's underrepresentation in college?
Wait, wait, let me guess. They want more men in college so they can impose the mandate for the vaccine created by womens to kill men! Ingenious.
Because of two reasons.
Women need successful men to fulfill their purpose as Hirudo medicinalis.
Colleges control who they admit, they're gaining credibility from shouting into a void
LOL! It takes nerve to argue simultaneously "WOMEN ARE ROOTING FOR MALE SUCCESS!" AND "WOMEN WANT TO KILL US" and "WOMEN SABOTAGE BOYS' EDUCATION".
You are literally insane.
So first you claim that The Federalist is bad because it mentioned Brookings, even though Brookings is defending boys. How can you even live with such insanity and cognitive disosnance?