That would explain why they unironically referred to the Brookings Institute, a Melinda Gates funded thinktank that exists purely to direct tradcons away from blaming women like her.
Fourth. I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop" (because they're not behind the girls enough...)
That was just obfuscation of the now confirmed open discrimination against boys in the schools.
I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
You're mad because there was a child support plan that didn't include a requirement for paternity tests?
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop"
The whole article is just a thin defence of the teaching profession that suggested they aren't to blame for boys doing worse, which aged like fucking milk when an Italian study confirmed that yes, teachers do openly and consciously discriminate against boys.
That would explain why they unironically referred to the Brookings Institute, a Melinda Gates funded thinktank that exists purely to direct tradcons away from blaming women like her.
Noted, I'll delete and archive for reposting.
Is this the first time you have heard about the Brookings Institute?
Fourth. I remember that idiot that runs it suggested a child support reform bull (bull is the right word, autocorrect, but you need the second part) that didn't include forcing the woman to allow a paternity test to release funds.
Then there was a weird idea of boys starting school later to "help them develop" (because they're not behind the girls enough...)
That was just obfuscation of the now confirmed open discrimination against boys in the schools.
You're mad because there was a child support plan that didn't include a requirement for paternity tests?
I'm sure that definitely happened.
Yes. It's literally the bare minimum to reform it, to ensure nobody's stuck providing for someone else's child.
I always have the archives. Notice where he published it? There's the link to the Silicon Valley whore brigade again.
The whole article is just a thin defence of the teaching profession that suggested they aren't to blame for boys doing worse, which aged like fucking milk when an Italian study confirmed that yes, teachers do openly and consciously discriminate against boys.