Because as we all know, whether or not women will sleep with a guy is the best way to determine his moral character.
i never understood that there is a general social sentiment that women are a good litmus test of a mans moral character. Women will sleep with a 130lb drugged out lead guitarist in a band who doesnt have a cent to his name and hasnt washed his hair in a week. Women will make a baby with a drug dealing thug who lives with his mother.
PS: there was a thread on a body building form where a guy posted on a dating site a picture of an attractive man with a bio saying he was a 3 time convicted child molester and women didnt care, he still go their numbers and posted their conversations. Another one posted an attractive man with an obvious swastika tat, same outcome.
i never understood that there is a general social sentiment that women are a good litmus test of a mans moral character. Women will sleep with a 130lb drugged out lead guitarist in a band who doesnt have a cent to his name and hasnt washed his hair in a week. Women will make a baby with a drug dealing thug who lives with his mother.
PS: there was a thread on a body building form where a guy posted on a dating site a picture of an attractive man with a bio saying he was a 3 time convicted child molester and women didnt care, he still go their numbers and posted their conversations. Another one posted an attractive man with an obvious swastika tat, same outcome.
I mean, are men any different? You put some single mother THOT with multiple kids, no job, begging for money, but with big tits hanging out there and simps are going to be all over her.
People are nasty and make shitty decisions when they think with their pussies or dicks. End of story. That's why we need a structured society control our animal side.
women have inherent value for being able to create life, up until about 35 they are seen as valuable for that alone, and they have exploited it big time.
But I wasnt talking about either sexes value, but who are the arbiters of judging moral character, and its absolutely not women despite the social sentiment for it.
If incels were honest with themselves, they'd admit what they really want is female validation.
Anyone with $200 in his pocket can get sex, if the celibacy was really the issue. If hiring a prostitute sounds gross, which I think it is, it's an admission that they really want someone who wants to be with them of her own accord, which equals validation.
But what these men need to understand is that it's not a validation at all, or at least not a validation worth anything, like you allude to.
60 seconds of sticky friction and empty words of affection, paid in cash or in trade for goods, actually is pretty disposable compared to all the experiences the world has to offer.
Now, men who want to start a family should focus on those experiences, because that not only also attracts women but the right kind of women, and help provide the wisdom to be a better father anyway.
i never understood that there is a general social sentiment that women are a good litmus test of a mans moral character. Women will sleep with a 130lb drugged out lead guitarist in a band who doesnt have a cent to his name and hasnt washed his hair in a week. Women will make a baby with a drug dealing thug who lives with his mother.
PS: there was a thread on a body building form where a guy posted on a dating site a picture of an attractive man with a bio saying he was a 3 time convicted child molester and women didnt care, he still go their numbers and posted their conversations. Another one posted an attractive man with an obvious swastika tat, same outcome.
I mean, are men any different? You put some single mother THOT with multiple kids, no job, begging for money, but with big tits hanging out there and simps are going to be all over her.
People are nasty and make shitty decisions when they think with their pussies or dicks. End of story. That's why we need a structured society control our animal side.
true, but no one says your average simp is a good litmus test of a womans moral character. thats the point you missed.
Women are judged for what they are, men are judged for what they have.
women have inherent value for being able to create life, up until about 35 they are seen as valuable for that alone, and they have exploited it big time.
But I wasnt talking about either sexes value, but who are the arbiters of judging moral character, and its absolutely not women despite the social sentiment for it.
Fair enough
If incels were honest with themselves, they'd admit what they really want is female validation.
Anyone with $200 in his pocket can get sex, if the celibacy was really the issue. If hiring a prostitute sounds gross, which I think it is, it's an admission that they really want someone who wants to be with them of her own accord, which equals validation.
But what these men need to understand is that it's not a validation at all, or at least not a validation worth anything, like you allude to.
60 seconds of sticky friction and empty words of affection, paid in cash or in trade for goods, actually is pretty disposable compared to all the experiences the world has to offer.
Now, men who want to start a family should focus on those experiences, because that not only also attracts women but the right kind of women, and help provide the wisdom to be a better father anyway.