The funny thing is Bret/Heather were originally pro lockdown/vaccine at FIRST.
Then they had a shitload of discussion, analyzed the data, looked at data from outside sources that conflicted with their inherent beliefs and realized COVID wasn't worth locking the world down for.
Then when the vaccines came out, they were pro-vaccine at first and then again, went over studies again and again and again, and saw that it quickly got shittier and shittier, then saw the side effects, then saw how LEAKY it is (i.e. how easily you could accidentally inject it wrong and cause those side effects), then saw how shitty was at was at STOPPING infection, etc. etc.
They truly believed in the SOYIENCE (tm) - but like Dr. John Campbell on Youtube, they actually followed it and applied the scientific method to this data, and realized what was taken to combat it was actually ineffective and absolutely pointless.
Is there any source I missed that was correct about the vaccines from the start?
I forgot about Bret/Heather ever being pro Covid vaccine?
I remember them pointing out that “hiding the pfizer test results is fake science” - “a man in a labcoat telling you his conclusions isn’t science.”
I hesitated to include John Campbell because he was pro vax for a very long time. But After getting his youtube channel almost removed for questioning pfizer he can now see how manipulative the ScIEncE (TM) is.
They want you to look closely. But not too closely.
Absolutely nobody on youtube has been correct because they haven't been allowed to be. It was literally against the rules to be right. On YT - I can't think of anybody who generally knew the truth but also had the balls to work around the rules to direct people to the truth. Vinay Prasad, Dr Been... they all come with their caveats despite being useful informants on certain topics.
Substack, /pol/, occasional twitter posts that didn't get smacked down, ironically govt statistical websites in the wake of vaccine rollout... this is where people had to go. Jonathan Couey aka GigaOhmBiological is generally very good on Twitch or his own site, although I found him late and he's relatively obscure, plus his focus on technical scientific aspects of immunology leads him to label people as misinformation sources when they get those aspects wrong. Still, considering what a surfeit of trust has done to the world, I'm fine with cranking up the distrust for a while. Interestingly, he has always been suspicious of Bret Weinstein and his latest vod contains a clip around the 4:30 mark of Weinstein talking to Sam Harris as the latter compared antivaxx sentiment to islamic jihadism - in 2019. Make of that what you will.
Bret/Heather did - they got their channel demonetized because of it. Also Twitch is going to drop the hammer on him once some Karen retard finds out about Giga.
Also take note these two are willing to change their minds when they're proven wrong, and they HAVE been repeatedly and are now staunchly anti-vaccine. Not anti-all vaccines, but anti THIS vaccine.
I haven't kept up with Bret's developing stance on the vaccines, especially since his feud with Sam Harris seemed like so much artificially signal-boosted drama theatre, but if he wasn't pointing out that the vaccines are probably making everything worse then he wasn't telling the truth. I would be surprised if he had actually said that, since I believe it would be tough to keep a video up on YT saying that at all, never mind demonetisation. Maybe it's different in late 2022 now that the dam is bursting.
Promoting Ivermectin would be enough to get him demonetised, since several other YTers have to make up code words and euphemisms to even refer to the word at all, let alone discuss it or promote it.
He believes the vaccines are A PART of the actual treatment protocol, but they're not the ONLY means of combating COVID. He looked into HCQ early in the pandemic lifetime and has consistently repeated how effective Ivermectin is.
He's also been pushing for aspiration before the vaccine is administered as he found studies showing that one of the reasons why we're getting these clots is because the vaccine is being administered wrong. It's ending up in the bloodstream instead of staying in the muscle and aspiration prevents that. This still doesn't change the fact that the vaccine is essentially worthless at stopping the spread, but again, he is a GATEWAY for normies to learn that there's a lot of fuckery going about in the SOYENCE.
He's also talked about Vitamin D deficiencies being a significant cause of these bad outcomes as well.
He was one of the first people to talk about Omicron and to let us know that it will be hitting the West, but it will be mild and most likely be the actual end of the coof.
He's also have repeatedly pointed out the effectiveness of natural immunity over the ineffective vaccines and his opinion of how unnecessary it is to force people to get these vaccines when natural immunity appears to be helping most people already.
I can go on but yeah, he doesn't go into the MUH GREAT RESET territory, but much like the Weinsteins he still has faith in the SOYENCE and has been gobsmacked at the way his peers have been sucking the cock of big pharma and the mainstream media.
Campbell looked at the Omicron data, saw that the vaccinated were overrepresented among the hospitalised, quickly glossed over it and still presented it as 'a good reason to get the booster'. This was months after there was enough data that showed they were useless at best and more likelyh to be making everything much worse. This is far too slow for anyone pretending to be analytically minded and a source of health related info.
If anything I suspect Campbell was a vector for large numbers of normies in 2021 to go and get needlessly vaxxed because they found him and falsely believed they had found a trustworthy source, beyond the media smokescreen, who was still saying there were good reasons to get the jabs. The only good thing he did was advocate for Ivermectin (and showed that it was included in the kits distributed to India).
The funny thing is Bret/Heather were originally pro lockdown/vaccine at FIRST.
Most of us were, because it was originally covered up and played down whilst China lied about it and in the meantime bought up the worlds mask supplies.
I spent January and February 2020 stocking up on food. The initial case reports of this disease were not promising.
I wasn't part of the "most of us". I was highly skeptical and worried it was being pushed out way too fast. I have all my other vaccine shots (at least the big ones) and I get the flu vaccine once a year since it's been proven by TEH SOYENCE for over a decade, but this vaccine was obviously rushed and anything rushed is going to have tons of corners cut to to get it out.
I too am a clanker and stocked up as soon as Styx saw the writing on the wall.
I think most people are in favour of the status quo, and that's generally a good thing. We have good lives here, relatively high freedom, and anything radical will almost certainly destroy what we have.
However, it's becoming obvious that there is, literally, a global conspiracy to infiltrate, co-opt, and subvert our status quo. That being the case, nothing can be trusted anymore.
Unfortunately, we have little understanding of our systems that produce the things we want so it's hard to know what to do.
then saw how LEAKY it is (i.e. how easily you could accidentally inject it wrong and cause those side effects)
This is not what is meant by a leaky vaccine. You're referring to broken promise #1410242 of the mrna jabs which was that it was initially said to keep the lipid nanoparticles and spike localised to the site of injection. One of the theories about the adverse effects is that it they happen because the injection is made intravenously instead of into the muscle.
The 'leak' concern of a leaky vaccine refers to the figurative larger scale of a leak in the notional immune protection within a group, so that a vaccine does not keep the spread contained. The dangers of a vaccine that does not do this revolve generally around the fact that continued spread among the vaccinated allows the viral replication to occur more and more selectively against the immune protection provided, until it's extra lethal, extra infectious or whatever. cf. Marek's disease in chickens. Thankfully this appears to have been one of the few things that's not a concern with these jabs since the protection is so shit that it acts like no protection at all or negative protection.
The funny thing is Bret/Heather were originally pro lockdown/vaccine at FIRST.
Then they had a shitload of discussion, analyzed the data, looked at data from outside sources that conflicted with their inherent beliefs and realized COVID wasn't worth locking the world down for.
Then when the vaccines came out, they were pro-vaccine at first and then again, went over studies again and again and again, and saw that it quickly got shittier and shittier, then saw the side effects, then saw how LEAKY it is (i.e. how easily you could accidentally inject it wrong and cause those side effects), then saw how shitty was at was at STOPPING infection, etc. etc.
They truly believed in the SOYIENCE (tm) - but like Dr. John Campbell on Youtube, they actually followed it and applied the scientific method to this data, and realized what was taken to combat it was actually ineffective and absolutely pointless.
Is there any source I missed that was correct about the vaccines from the start?
I forgot about Bret/Heather ever being pro Covid vaccine?
I remember them pointing out that “hiding the pfizer test results is fake science” - “a man in a labcoat telling you his conclusions isn’t science.”
I hesitated to include John Campbell because he was pro vax for a very long time. But After getting his youtube channel almost removed for questioning pfizer he can now see how manipulative the ScIEncE (TM) is.
They want you to look closely. But not too closely.
Absolutely nobody on youtube has been correct because they haven't been allowed to be. It was literally against the rules to be right. On YT - I can't think of anybody who generally knew the truth but also had the balls to work around the rules to direct people to the truth. Vinay Prasad, Dr Been... they all come with their caveats despite being useful informants on certain topics.
Substack, /pol/, occasional twitter posts that didn't get smacked down, ironically govt statistical websites in the wake of vaccine rollout... this is where people had to go. Jonathan Couey aka GigaOhmBiological is generally very good on Twitch or his own site, although I found him late and he's relatively obscure, plus his focus on technical scientific aspects of immunology leads him to label people as misinformation sources when they get those aspects wrong. Still, considering what a surfeit of trust has done to the world, I'm fine with cranking up the distrust for a while. Interestingly, he has always been suspicious of Bret Weinstein and his latest vod contains a clip around the 4:30 mark of Weinstein talking to Sam Harris as the latter compared antivaxx sentiment to islamic jihadism - in 2019. Make of that what you will.
Bret/Heather did - they got their channel demonetized because of it. Also Twitch is going to drop the hammer on him once some Karen retard finds out about Giga.
Also take note these two are willing to change their minds when they're proven wrong, and they HAVE been repeatedly and are now staunchly anti-vaccine. Not anti-all vaccines, but anti THIS vaccine.
I haven't kept up with Bret's developing stance on the vaccines, especially since his feud with Sam Harris seemed like so much artificially signal-boosted drama theatre, but if he wasn't pointing out that the vaccines are probably making everything worse then he wasn't telling the truth. I would be surprised if he had actually said that, since I believe it would be tough to keep a video up on YT saying that at all, never mind demonetisation. Maybe it's different in late 2022 now that the dam is bursting.
Promoting Ivermectin would be enough to get him demonetised, since several other YTers have to make up code words and euphemisms to even refer to the word at all, let alone discuss it or promote it.
He believes the vaccines are A PART of the actual treatment protocol, but they're not the ONLY means of combating COVID. He looked into HCQ early in the pandemic lifetime and has consistently repeated how effective Ivermectin is.
He's also been pushing for aspiration before the vaccine is administered as he found studies showing that one of the reasons why we're getting these clots is because the vaccine is being administered wrong. It's ending up in the bloodstream instead of staying in the muscle and aspiration prevents that. This still doesn't change the fact that the vaccine is essentially worthless at stopping the spread, but again, he is a GATEWAY for normies to learn that there's a lot of fuckery going about in the SOYENCE.
He's also talked about Vitamin D deficiencies being a significant cause of these bad outcomes as well.
He was one of the first people to talk about Omicron and to let us know that it will be hitting the West, but it will be mild and most likely be the actual end of the coof.
He's also have repeatedly pointed out the effectiveness of natural immunity over the ineffective vaccines and his opinion of how unnecessary it is to force people to get these vaccines when natural immunity appears to be helping most people already.
I can go on but yeah, he doesn't go into the MUH GREAT RESET territory, but much like the Weinsteins he still has faith in the SOYENCE and has been gobsmacked at the way his peers have been sucking the cock of big pharma and the mainstream media.
Campbell looked at the Omicron data, saw that the vaccinated were overrepresented among the hospitalised, quickly glossed over it and still presented it as 'a good reason to get the booster'. This was months after there was enough data that showed they were useless at best and more likelyh to be making everything much worse. This is far too slow for anyone pretending to be analytically minded and a source of health related info.
If anything I suspect Campbell was a vector for large numbers of normies in 2021 to go and get needlessly vaxxed because they found him and falsely believed they had found a trustworthy source, beyond the media smokescreen, who was still saying there were good reasons to get the jabs. The only good thing he did was advocate for Ivermectin (and showed that it was included in the kits distributed to India).
Most of us were, because it was originally covered up and played down whilst China lied about it and in the meantime bought up the worlds mask supplies.
I spent January and February 2020 stocking up on food. The initial case reports of this disease were not promising.
Then in March they quarantined a cruise ship outside the US and not a single person on board died. That's when everyone should've stopped caring
I remember that ship, Styx covered it quite a bit.
I wasn't part of the "most of us". I was highly skeptical and worried it was being pushed out way too fast. I have all my other vaccine shots (at least the big ones) and I get the flu vaccine once a year since it's been proven by TEH SOYENCE for over a decade, but this vaccine was obviously rushed and anything rushed is going to have tons of corners cut to to get it out.
I too am a clanker and stocked up as soon as Styx saw the writing on the wall.
I think most people are in favour of the status quo, and that's generally a good thing. We have good lives here, relatively high freedom, and anything radical will almost certainly destroy what we have.
However, it's becoming obvious that there is, literally, a global conspiracy to infiltrate, co-opt, and subvert our status quo. That being the case, nothing can be trusted anymore.
Unfortunately, we have little understanding of our systems that produce the things we want so it's hard to know what to do.
This is not what is meant by a leaky vaccine. You're referring to broken promise #1410242 of the mrna jabs which was that it was initially said to keep the lipid nanoparticles and spike localised to the site of injection. One of the theories about the adverse effects is that it they happen because the injection is made intravenously instead of into the muscle.
The 'leak' concern of a leaky vaccine refers to the figurative larger scale of a leak in the notional immune protection within a group, so that a vaccine does not keep the spread contained. The dangers of a vaccine that does not do this revolve generally around the fact that continued spread among the vaccinated allows the viral replication to occur more and more selectively against the immune protection provided, until it's extra lethal, extra infectious or whatever. cf. Marek's disease in chickens. Thankfully this appears to have been one of the few things that's not a concern with these jabs since the protection is so shit that it acts like no protection at all or negative protection.