Letby, 32, is alleged to have gone on a year-long killing spree while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital - including one child who died less than 90 minutes after being handed into her care.
The specially trained ICU nurse was described as a 'constant malevolent presence' on the Cheshire children's unit where she allegedly killed and injured many vulnerable children - including twins.
The prosecutor said two babies - referred to as Baby F and Baby L for legal reasons - were 'poisoned' by Letby 'deliberately with insulin'. They were attacked allegedly eight months apart with each of them from separate sets of twins. Both boys' blood sugar 'inexplicably dropped to dangerous levels' - but both survived 'because of the skill of the staff in the neonatal unit', the court heard.
He said both of the twins injected with insulin each had a baby brother, Baby E and Baby M, who were both also allegedly attacked by Letby.
They were all the work, we say, of the woman in the dock, who we say was the constant malevolent presence when things turned to the worst for these 17 children
Nick Johnson KC, prosecuting.
May God guide him to getting this one locked up forever. I'm not particularly religious but he needs all the help he can get to prevent her getting off in the UK's system.
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
As evidenced by?
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
Oh wow, what happened to you there? It's probably because of your incorrect view that feminists have any more regard for women than men, as opposed to having a regard only for political power. Your 1D comprehension of the world cannot take that.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
What does that have to do with feminism?
If she had done that, you'd have claimed that women are "leeches", by the way. Just like you said about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend, because you made up that he got a "huge settlement" and then anxiously avoided answering any question about that "huge settlement" you pulled out of your ass.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
You have the habit of referring to 'them', 'they' and 'that conclusion' without ever making it clear what exactly it is.
The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking. I'm surprised the tradcons at TD haven't latched onto this for "women's devaluation of unborn life takes the next step".
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that a male nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do by not immediately suggesting, even though I strongly believe it, that this is motivated by hate for males.
The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking.
What does that have to do with feminism?
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that the nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do.
A rare showing of decency by you. And "women" don't do that. You just follow a few retards and then attack women as a whole for what they say.
Because feminism is inherently sadistic. Feminist leaders in the UK do nothing but spew hate against men, the Sarah Everard rallies featured women threatening to "make men afraid to walk the streets".
I didn't downvote, but I suspect you got downvoted because seeing a news article about a hospital serial killer and saying 'the fruits of feminism' because the murderer happens to female is low hanging fruit.
It's like a feminist posting an article about Dr. Harold Shipman and saying 'white male doctors in a nutshell'
Female serial killers have existed far longer than feminism, and poison has long been their typical weapon. Nothing even remotely new.
This is actually new though. Nothing like this has ever happened. Harold Shipman killed his victims for wealth. He wrote wills in their name and had them cremated, gaining significant wealth from his victims.
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
She's going to get 15 minutes in prison - with 10 minutes off for good behavior - and when she gets out nobody will do anything to her.
Societies deserve what they tolerate.
She'll get life in prison.
In the UK? I'd place a bet on 10 years and being banned from being around children.
Bet accepted.
I should have said she'd get paroled after ten. Fuck.
Right, making sure that no one can disprove you between now and 10 years.
No, it's because I realised pretending to lock her up forever and quietly releasing her when everyone's forgotten is a much more likely outcome.
Which, ironically, is exactly what you said about Kim Potter.
The prosecutors would "wait for a quiet moment to drop the charges".
Nick Johnson KC, prosecuting.
May God guide him to getting this one locked up forever. I'm not particularly religious but he needs all the help he can get to prevent her getting off in the UK's system.
What is the connection to feminism here?
As I said -
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
As evidenced by?
Oh wow, what happened to you there? It's probably because of your incorrect view that feminists have any more regard for women than men, as opposed to having a regard only for political power. Your 1D comprehension of the world cannot take that.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
What does that have to do with feminism?
If she had done that, you'd have claimed that women are "leeches", by the way. Just like you said about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend, because you made up that he got a "huge settlement" and then anxiously avoided answering any question about that "huge settlement" you pulled out of your ass.
You have the habit of referring to 'them', 'they' and 'that conclusion' without ever making it clear what exactly it is.
The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking. I'm surprised the tradcons at TD haven't latched onto this for "women's devaluation of unborn life takes the next step".
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that a male nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do by not immediately suggesting, even though I strongly believe it, that this is motivated by hate for males.
What does that have to do with feminism?
A rare showing of decency by you. And "women" don't do that. You just follow a few retards and then attack women as a whole for what they say.
Because feminism is inherently sadistic. Feminist leaders in the UK do nothing but spew hate against men, the Sarah Everard rallies featured women threatening to "make men afraid to walk the streets".
Imagine being so sick that you downvote a post hoping someone who murdered 7 babies gets locked up. #JustConProThings.
I didn't downvote, but I suspect you got downvoted because seeing a news article about a hospital serial killer and saying 'the fruits of feminism' because the murderer happens to female is low hanging fruit.
It's like a feminist posting an article about Dr. Harold Shipman and saying 'white male doctors in a nutshell'
Female serial killers have existed far longer than feminism, and poison has long been their typical weapon. Nothing even remotely new.
This is actually new though. Nothing like this has ever happened. Harold Shipman killed his victims for wealth. He wrote wills in their name and had them cremated, gaining significant wealth from his victims.
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
Fairly certain that you are unfortunately wrong. There have been some very malevolent doctors and nurses throughout history.
Shit like this has absolutely happened before and it's been done by both men and women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petr_Zelenka_(serial_killer)
No fuck any of the dipshits downvoting this.
I'm not crying about it. I just think it's interesting what kind of people they are.
I would never downvote a post from them against a baby murderer.
Stormfags would know all about faggotry, given their obsession with tight black leather suits.
Stormfags support baby-killing is the only rational conclusion anyone can draw from that.