Wow, even your predictions after the fact are wrong. She got 2 years.
Yeah, after you claimed that (1) she would not be indicted, then (2) that her name and photo would not be released, that (3) the prosecutors would quietly drop the charges and then that (4) she would get only probation. Upcoming claims: the governor will pardon her. She'll be dug up and resurrected to be paid damages for her time in prison.
Because you brilliantly concluded that Kim Potter "was just looking for an opportunity to kill a man". Remember that?
You shouldn't bring that up as "proof that women get punished".
I brought it up as proof that you are always wrong, because you are.
Right, making sure that no one can disprove you between now and 10 years.
No, it's because I realised pretending to lock her up forever and quietly releasing her when everyone's forgotten is a much more likely outcome.
Which, ironically, is exactly what you said about Kim Potter.
The prosecutors would "wait for a quiet moment to drop the charges".
She got 14 months for killing someone.
You shouldn't bring that up as "proof that women get punished".
Wow, even your predictions after the fact are wrong. She got 2 years.
Yeah, after you claimed that (1) she would not be indicted, then (2) that her name and photo would not be released, that (3) the prosecutors would quietly drop the charges and then that (4) she would get only probation. Upcoming claims: the governor will pardon her. She'll be dug up and resurrected to be paid damages for her time in prison.
Because you brilliantly concluded that Kim Potter "was just looking for an opportunity to kill a man". Remember that?
I brought it up as proof that you are always wrong, because you are.