The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking. I'm surprised the tradcons at TD haven't latched onto this for "women's devaluation of unborn life takes the next step".
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that a male nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do by not immediately suggesting, even though I strongly believe it, that this is motivated by hate for males.
The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking.
What does that have to do with feminism?
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that the nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do.
A rare showing of decency by you. And "women" don't do that. You just follow a few retards and then attack women as a whole for what they say.
Because feminism is inherently sadistic. Feminist leaders in the UK do nothing but spew hate against men, the Sarah Everard rallies featured women threatening to "make men afraid to walk the streets".
Even if feminism is 'inherently sadistic', that would not make any act of sadism feminism. It's the fallacy of affirming the consequent. You are as bad as basic logic as you are at predicting stuff.
the Sarah Everard rallies featured women threatening to "make men afraid to walk the streets".
Still less egregious that you saying that Sarah Everhard deserved to be murdered.
But nobody devalues the lives of babies more than feminists. She's that final step the tradcons always say will come from abortion. I really wish she'd get asked in court, under oath, if she is a feminist or a lesbian. I'm willing to bet she's at least one of those.
She didn't exist, so it's like saying I wish someone would murder Trevor Phillips from GTA.
The fact that all she has to gain is the "pleasure" of killing babies. It's an inherently sadistic way of thinking. I'm surprised the tradcons at TD haven't latched onto this for "women's devaluation of unborn life takes the next step".
Women would have jumped to the conclusion that a male nurse was targeting girls before even getting one victim's data. I'm showing the restraint and respect for victims that they never do by not immediately suggesting, even though I strongly believe it, that this is motivated by hate for males.
What does that have to do with feminism?
A rare showing of decency by you. And "women" don't do that. You just follow a few retards and then attack women as a whole for what they say.
Because feminism is inherently sadistic. Feminist leaders in the UK do nothing but spew hate against men, the Sarah Everard rallies featured women threatening to "make men afraid to walk the streets".
Even if feminism is 'inherently sadistic', that would not make any act of sadism feminism. It's the fallacy of affirming the consequent. You are as bad as basic logic as you are at predicting stuff.
Still less egregious that you saying that Sarah Everhard deserved to be murdered.
But nobody devalues the lives of babies more than feminists. She's that final step the tradcons always say will come from abortion. I really wish she'd get asked in court, under oath, if she is a feminist or a lesbian. I'm willing to bet she's at least one of those.
She didn't exist, so it's like saying I wish someone would murder Trevor Phillips from GTA.