This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
As evidenced by?
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
Oh wow, what happened to you there? It's probably because of your incorrect view that feminists have any more regard for women than men, as opposed to having a regard only for political power. Your 1D comprehension of the world cannot take that.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
What does that have to do with feminism?
If she had done that, you'd have claimed that women are "leeches", by the way. Just like you said about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend, because you made up that he got a "huge settlement" and then anxiously avoided answering any question about that "huge settlement" you pulled out of your ass.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
You have the habit of referring to 'them', 'they' and 'that conclusion' without ever making it clear what exactly it is.
What is the connection to feminism here?
As I said -
This woman is driven by nothing but the kind of sadism synonymous with feminist beliefs.
You could also bring up the majority of her victims being male, but I'm not willing to jump to that conclusion until a full report on the attempts is available.
As evidenced by?
Oh wow, what happened to you there? It's probably because of your incorrect view that feminists have any more regard for women than men, as opposed to having a regard only for political power. Your 1D comprehension of the world cannot take that.
The fact that she targeted babies, who have no wealth? Harold Shipman targeted lonely old people, and changed their wills to his name. That was a clear profit motive.
If it was a male nurse, women would have jumped to that conclusion before they even had a modicum of data, like they do with every single shooting.
What does that have to do with feminism?
If she had done that, you'd have claimed that women are "leeches", by the way. Just like you said about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend, because you made up that he got a "huge settlement" and then anxiously avoided answering any question about that "huge settlement" you pulled out of your ass.
You have the habit of referring to 'them', 'they' and 'that conclusion' without ever making it clear what exactly it is.