Ugh. I shouldn't have to edit anything on the off chance that someone actually harms the person who advocates violence against defenseless men.
I think you misunderstood, though the comment is OK now. Firing squad was not the problem, nor family members. This is highly likely to be understood (and/or maliciously spun) as a call to extralegal violence, regardless of how you intended it.
This should be OK (obviously, I can't guarantee): After they are found guilty during a fair trial, the family members of those who were murdered because of 'coercive control' should be able to make part of the firing squad.
You get overly emotional and then stray across the line. I don't want you to get banned, cause it's boring here without you. So I give you some advice with good intents based on my own experience and the 3 years or so that I have worked with DoM. At least do what you do while being aware of the risks, instead of being stubborn and telling me that I'm wrong.
What about her coercive control against the male population? Why can't I just pick up a hammer in Minecraft?
?
Last word on "in Minecraft" stuff was that it would be read as the exact same thing without the Minecraft part.
It really is a great irony, censoring alleged calls for violence against someone who openly and joyfully calls for violence
It is no irony at all, for the same reason that the troons can with impunity say "kill TERFs" and send rape threats to women who disagree with them. You are a mere straight white man. You do not have the same rights as your betters on the Oppression Stack.
uses JK Rowling's bottomless well of cash to pay for lawyers for those who act on it.
Is Rowling paying for lawyers for those who kill men?
Honestly I just wanted an excuse to bring up Bindel's hero, Sally Challen, who drove to her ex-partner's house to "apologise for their conflict" and instead beat him to death with a hammer in the middle of the night. Claimed coercive control and was sentenced to time served, a grand total of 5 years for openly sadistic and premeditated murder. The autopsy claimed he was hit 22 times in the skull, which would have made his death slow and painful from severe brain damage.
Do so in a way that does not put you at risk of getting banned.
None of that has ever happened, it's all been false flags by a group of genocidal sadists.
You expect me to believe that?
Rowling is a known backer of Julie Bindel, who leads Justice for Women, the organization paying for those lawyers.
Assuming arguendo for a moment that Justice for Women is playing those lawyers, do you have any evidence at all that Rowling has given a dime to Justice for Women?
I wonder if Rowling would feel bad if her son was killed by a Coercive Control murderer. I doubt it.
I think you misunderstood, though the comment is OK now. Firing squad was not the problem, nor family members. This is highly likely to be understood (and/or maliciously spun) as a call to extralegal violence, regardless of how you intended it.
This should be OK (obviously, I can't guarantee): After they are found guilty during a fair trial, the family members of those who were murdered because of 'coercive control' should be able to make part of the firing squad.
You get overly emotional and then stray across the line. I don't want you to get banned, cause it's boring here without you. So I give you some advice with good intents based on my own experience and the 3 years or so that I have worked with DoM. At least do what you do while being aware of the risks, instead of being stubborn and telling me that I'm wrong.
?
Last word on "in Minecraft" stuff was that it would be read as the exact same thing without the Minecraft part.
It is no irony at all, for the same reason that the troons can with impunity say "kill TERFs" and send rape threats to women who disagree with them. You are a mere straight white man. You do not have the same rights as your betters on the Oppression Stack.
Is Rowling paying for lawyers for those who kill men?
Do so in a way that does not put you at risk of getting banned.
You expect me to believe that?
Assuming arguendo for a moment that Justice for Women is playing those lawyers, do you have any evidence at all that Rowling has given a dime to Justice for Women?
This is an unhealthy level of hatred.