Who are the Montagnards?

The people in Vietnam's central highlands. US Special forces trained them to fight the communists, and they did so on their own very successfully until very late in the war when they were overwhelmed. This was in contrast to the rest of Vietnam where the people were fucking useless and needed Americans to do all the fighting for them.

pushing Globohomo is in the interests of the US

It's not. It's only in the interests of the political Left, the Democrats. The Right/Republicans mostly despise that shit, though to some degree they're too cucked to stand up to it because they're afraid of getting "canceled".

Look what you did to Iran.

Why do you put that entirely on the US? Faggot Europe did gay marriage BEFORE the US, quite a long time before. Faggot Europe was doing gay marriage 20 years ago when the US was still arresting faggots for sodomy.

You need to accept that the globohomo movement is PRIMARILY coming from NW Europe [UK, France, Germany, Nordics, Low countries, maybe some Italy/Spain] and commonwealth Canada/Australia/NZ, and only also from the US to a lesser degree because here in the US, we actually fight back against it. As late as 2008 CALIFORNIA banned gay marriage. Saying "oh it's all the US" is fucking simple minded. It's the LEFT in the US, which is a much smaller proportion of the US compared to other white countries, where the Left is much more dominant. The US could disappear off the earth tomorrow and yet globohomo would not stop or even slow down at all.

Putin did not make Russia corrupt. It has always been corrupt, and it probably always will be.

Putin used corruption as the basis of his government instead of trying to fight it. You resign yourself to saying Russia "probably always will be" corrupt, but that is nonsense. Corruption is just culture and culture can change. Every 3rd world country has to be able to fight corruption to develop further, and all of them have. Look at mexico as one example. Is mexico stil corrupt? Somewhat. But was it MUCH worse in the 1980s? Absolutely. If the mexicans can improve, it's nonsense to say the russians cannot.

But of course they cannot as long as Putin is around, because his government essentially exploits corruption as a means of maintaining power.

Yeah, I think in a few decades, Poland and Hungary will fall to Globohomo as well.

Maybe, but the Right has not lost yet, and we are trying to make a comeback in the US to roll back the fucking disgusting excesses of the Left's perversion of our culture these past 10+ years.

Your statements about Putin are naive. Iran kept a "firm hand" and look what a shitshow it is there now. A "firm hand" only works until the government and society become disconnected enough that a revolution is triggered. The reason Poland and Hungary are different is that the people SUPPORT conservatism there. THAT is how you win. You need to CONVINCE the people to be right wing, not impose it top down and wait until they revolt. Putin's methods would eventually fail. Poland and Hungary offer at least a hope for a sustainable future.

Imagine if you do manage your fantasy of crushing Russian military power, like the allies did in 1918 with Germany. How are you going to stop Russian revanchism? Or do you think Russians will just accept your attempted destruction of their country?

Russia's defeat in Ukraine will be so humiliating and total as to completely and fully discredit and demoralize everyone who supported it. They will fall from power and influence as failures, and be replaced in power by those who generally opposed the war (likely in secret) who want to take Russia in a path of reconciliation with the West, not confrontation.

Germany in 1918 did not lose the war on the battlefield. It lost because of a "stab in the back" where primarily jewish communists caused internal collapse with revolutions. While the "stab in the back" is denounced today as antisemitic nazi propaganda by the Left today, it was (1) largely true in its main elements, and (2) widely believed by the German people. Even the leftist wiki page admits "widely believed and promulgated in Germany after 1918", summarizing it as "It maintained that the Imperial German Army did not lose World War I on the battlefield, but was instead betrayed by certain citizens on the home front—especially Jews, revolutionary socialists who fomented strikes and labor unrest"

LOL and what about that is in any way untrue? That's exactly what happened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Soviet_Republic Look up the leaders of that statelet: communist jews.

The point of all this is, that the German people didn't believe they were inferior or defeated, but rather BETRAYED. This gave them a lust for revenge and an abiding belief that, if the war was fought again, they would be victorious.

Show me where any of this sentiment exists in Russia today. It doesn't. The few in Russia who yearn for the days of the Soviet Union are few and a dying breed. Putin was forced to invoke conscription because he couldn't get enough volunteers even with large financial incentives.

You won't accept it, but Putin's 2022 invasion of Ukraine is the dying last gasp of the Soviet Union, which has been hospitalized and on life support in the hearts of people like Putin for 30 years. After this invasion fails in its totality, all Russian dreams of empire will die with it, and be forever buried. The idea that they would try again is laughable. With what army? Putin is cleaning out the old Soviet stocks even as we speak. He's lost the majority of Russia's active armored fighting vehicles already, Russia cannot produce more on short notice, and so Putin is emptying out and trying to refurbish old T-62s to fill the gap, and even then, it's not enough. If this war drags on another year, the Russian military will be a light infantry force with little remaining artillery or armored vehicles. It will take a decade to build up enough equipment even to bully a small country like Georgia.