He confuses a few key biological premises that frankly are far more important than “mid men” getting pussy, 1. Birth control has actively fucked up every woman who takes it, from mental state to extreme weight gain, 2. It was cultural “diversity” of men that created the sexual chasm we see today. Women always follow men. Hyper emotional, dumb men who just want to fuck and run were allowed to exist instead of society forcing them to marry the first chick they knocked up. No fault divorce was key to this. 3. The “equal” workplace has created unsustainable bloat where driven men could thrive initially. This is shown in the corporate binge and purge structure down to the insane amount of administrative jobs currently in existence. We truthfully have a crisis of individuals who are inferior to the nuclear family structure in terms of quality of workers.
Hyper emotional, dumb men who just want to fuck and run were allowed to exist instead of society forcing them to marry the first chick they knocked up. No fault divorce was key to this.
Yes, and why do we have that? We have it because feminists wanted to be able to bail on the handsome, rugged, uneducated manual laborer the second they met a man with a bigger house and a nicer car.
Just wait till robot sex dolls and artificial wombs become available, then you'd have massive development........ whilst all the women that say the word 'equality' are left to fend for themselves on earth.
It'll get to the stage where all the equipment and institutions they need to keep it develop will break as the people who can maintain nope out and the replacements don't know how it works
We are heading towards a real life Atlad shrugged only they won't return to help them in the end
Yep, cuts the chaff out of the incel wheat field of ideas, focuses on the undeniable;
The 5/10 guy doesn't work hard if he doesn't have a wife whose pussy is worth working for, and we're hitting rock bottom on quality-of-wife for the mediocre man.
The outlook here is simple: this will not be an extinction event, but it will put serious pressure on civilizational infrastructure and produce a metric fuckton of female suffering. Hedge against the former by going long consumer goods, short industrials
Surely if you believe the dating market is going to collapse, you go long on companies that produce things men buy for fun, and short on MTCH and BMBL.
Well so has nearly everything else. I got out of everything that I could -- basically not long-term retirement mutual funds -- in May. No dogs in fight.
I'm barely breaking even thanks to beating down Bumble with heavy shorting, as well as Victoria's Secret. Those were my two biggest short wins, but I took shorts against a lot of female CEO companies this year. I'm honestly a little proud of my performance so far, considering it's mostly based on spite.
My mother has more options to short, being in Europe, so on my advice she went against the Embracer Group. +11% closed a couple of days ago. Not a bad performance for a couple of weeks.
Because of their acquisitions, like Gearbox, SQEnix and relatively reasonable valuation . I can't keep track of who all is woke. There are few enough video games companies that you can actually buy into. I'm not sure who wouldn't have exposure to woke, although I'm open to suggestions.
He confuses a few key biological premises that frankly are far more important than “mid men” getting pussy, 1. Birth control has actively fucked up every woman who takes it, from mental state to extreme weight gain, 2. It was cultural “diversity” of men that created the sexual chasm we see today. Women always follow men. Hyper emotional, dumb men who just want to fuck and run were allowed to exist instead of society forcing them to marry the first chick they knocked up. No fault divorce was key to this. 3. The “equal” workplace has created unsustainable bloat where driven men could thrive initially. This is shown in the corporate binge and purge structure down to the insane amount of administrative jobs currently in existence. We truthfully have a crisis of individuals who are inferior to the nuclear family structure in terms of quality of workers.
Yes, and why do we have that? We have it because feminists wanted to be able to bail on the handsome, rugged, uneducated manual laborer the second they met a man with a bigger house and a nicer car.
See no fault divorce? This wasn’t a feminist concept it was a communist one
They're same fucking thing, bro; Atheistic Judaism.
Feminism is marxist in origin
Its our subverted culture that indoctrinated into you that women's judgement/wanting to fuck you is a meaningful measure of your worth as a man.
100% true and the writing has some delicious morsels in it.
Just wait till robot sex dolls and artificial wombs become available, then you'd have massive development........ whilst all the women that say the word 'equality' are left to fend for themselves on earth.
They'll make those illegal before it becomes a threat.
It'll get to the stage where all the equipment and institutions they need to keep it develop will break as the people who can maintain nope out and the replacements don't know how it works
We are heading towards a real life Atlad shrugged only they won't return to help them in the end
One of the most concise explanations I’ve ever read on the topic.
Yep, cuts the chaff out of the incel wheat field of ideas, focuses on the undeniable;
The 5/10 guy doesn't work hard if he doesn't have a wife whose pussy is worth working for, and we're hitting rock bottom on quality-of-wife for the mediocre man.
Earlier in life its about pussy, later in life its about respect.
And right now there is none for fathers and husbands, so what is the point of the sacrifice?
NSFW cuz "fuck" in the title.
Surely if you believe the dating market is going to collapse, you go long on companies that produce things men buy for fun, and short on MTCH and BMBL.
Guns are always a safe bet. If you can find a way to invest.
Anyways I found the article from getting deep into Revolver based off another link here, and I thought you guys would like it :)
Actually, Smith and Wesson stock has done poorly. 51% down this year.
Well so has nearly everything else. I got out of everything that I could -- basically not long-term retirement mutual funds -- in May. No dogs in fight.
I'm barely breaking even thanks to beating down Bumble with heavy shorting, as well as Victoria's Secret. Those were my two biggest short wins, but I took shorts against a lot of female CEO companies this year. I'm honestly a little proud of my performance so far, considering it's mostly based on spite.
My mother has more options to short, being in Europe, so on my advice she went against the Embracer Group. +11% closed a couple of days ago. Not a bad performance for a couple of weeks.
Oh I have stock in Embracer group, too. That's a good bet. They have been on a buying spree. All good properties.
They're a good long-term bet, but a very poor short term one. That's why I said to short solely for a short period.
Customer Discretionary is going to get hammered.
Why do you invest in Embracer Group though, considering the woke shit they put out? (Saints Row 2022 was awful)
Because of their acquisitions, like Gearbox, SQEnix and relatively reasonable valuation . I can't keep track of who all is woke. There are few enough video games companies that you can actually buy into. I'm not sure who wouldn't have exposure to woke, although I'm open to suggestions.
They're the stock market IDs for Match.com and Bumble.
I just realized I didn't disclose that I am short on Bumble myself. That's kind of important when you're talking about it.
Because dating sites rely on a supply of naive men willing to play a rigged game.
They'll all die the moment men realize the game is rigged. Having said that, their stock is rising today.
Edit : And now it's not. The whole market crashes in the last hour.