Unlike you, whom I've seen flip between the same issues numerous times, most recently Epic Games and troonism, I've remained consistent.
The question still stands. This site exists because the people who made it refused to play by reddits repulsive, hypocrite standards. And yet here we are with a carbon copy of those same rules. Why?
Why can we not say that these freaks need killing?
It's hard to just...drop something that was the main thing you did with your friends, the main way you pass your time. I want to forgive them, but it makes it harder and harder every time they do something stupid.
Building on that, I've dropped so many things, I've put money down on my principles. I've shorted the villains of my world, bought huge positions in the companies I believe are good.
I never put Epic on my list of companies to condemn, so I'm not a hypocrite for changing my stances.
Regardless, even if you call me a hypocrite for being lenient towards them, there are people here that still have Netflix, Amazon Prime, Spotify etc.
There are people here who fund the very companies that are their undisputed enemy.
I'm none of those people nor do I participate in those things. I've had multiple family members disowned for being leftists. I walk the walk. Calling me a glowie is about as far from the truth as it's possible to be in a single sentence.
If you truly stood by what you believed, you'd know that killing trannies will just make them look like victims.
Look at how women still bring up Elliot Rodger.
From a purely strategic point of view, violence against them is stupid. Even if you don't believe killing is wrong, it's a poor strategy. It's not a good idea.
They're taking on the feminist machine and will eventually be destroyed by it, and if they beat it, we can easily destroy them with political means.
Despite the fact they mimick women's political strategy in every way, they do not have that ability to induce the "women are wonderful" effect like biological women do.
Nobody sane says "think of the trannies" when something bad happens. There will never be a situation where someone says trannies and children first. It will always be women.
I know you have an instinctive need to defend every monster with a Y chromosome, but most people would want the guy sending mail-order poisons to sterilise children dead, even if they don't say it out loud.
When did the word "stochastic" become so beloved by dumb people?
Grant Imahara used it on Mythbusters once or twice. One of them might've caught it in the marathon Discovery ran after he died, and then it became a meme.
It's kind of fascinating to watch when you can clearly tell the word went out from the upper tiers of the hive to start using a specific word or phrase. I'd love to have some way to watch the email lists and group chats where they gestate these things.
Did you know that male-to-female transgenders often complain about the “cotton ceiling”—the refusal of lesbian women to have sex with them because they have a penis?
What I said goes for both sides. Lesbians are whiny fucks who will say the most evil shit to men and then cry that they were "too scared" to say no to trannies. Trannies pushing this just sound rapey.
Explain why advocating violence shouldn't be allowed here again?
Seems to me like some people dying would be a public service.
some motherfuckers need killin
As the article demonstrated, transgender communists can now use a single post to get an entire website destroyed immediately.
That is more justification for their destruction, not less.
Did I walk into Chernobyl or something? Everything around this post glows.
Unlike you, whom I've seen flip between the same issues numerous times, most recently Epic Games and troonism, I've remained consistent.
The question still stands. This site exists because the people who made it refused to play by reddits repulsive, hypocrite standards. And yet here we are with a carbon copy of those same rules. Why?
Why can we not say that these freaks need killing?
The why is simple: look at Kiwifarms. Some rules are universal to staying on the internet.
It's hard to just...drop something that was the main thing you did with your friends, the main way you pass your time. I want to forgive them, but it makes it harder and harder every time they do something stupid.
Building on that, I've dropped so many things, I've put money down on my principles. I've shorted the villains of my world, bought huge positions in the companies I believe are good.
I never put Epic on my list of companies to condemn, so I'm not a hypocrite for changing my stances.
Regardless, even if you call me a hypocrite for being lenient towards them, there are people here that still have Netflix, Amazon Prime, Spotify etc.
There are people here who fund the very companies that are their undisputed enemy.
I'm none of those people nor do I participate in those things. I've had multiple family members disowned for being leftists. I walk the walk. Calling me a glowie is about as far from the truth as it's possible to be in a single sentence.
If you truly stood by what you believed, you'd know that killing trannies will just make them look like victims.
Look at how women still bring up Elliot Rodger.
From a purely strategic point of view, violence against them is stupid. Even if you don't believe killing is wrong, it's a poor strategy. It's not a good idea.
They're taking on the feminist machine and will eventually be destroyed by it, and if they beat it, we can easily destroy them with political means.
Despite the fact they mimick women's political strategy in every way, they do not have that ability to induce the "women are wonderful" effect like biological women do.
Nobody sane says "think of the trannies" when something bad happens. There will never be a situation where someone says trannies and children first. It will always be women.
I'm long past the point of caring about optics. I want them to BE victims, preferably a whole bunch of them at once, televised if possible.
Why did you downvote me? I'm trying to be civil.
I'm sure there's some catharsis in that thought, but if you really want to end trannyism, it's not helpful.
You're always defending women, and they use the same strategies.
My seemingly unbeatable enemy's enemy is not my friend, but might open a gap in their armor long enough for me to get a shot at defeating them.
I know you have an instinctive need to defend every monster with a Y chromosome, but most people would want the guy sending mail-order poisons to sterilise children dead, even if they don't say it out loud.
Grant Imahara used it on Mythbusters once or twice. One of them might've caught it in the marathon Discovery ran after he died, and then it became a meme.
(That is literally my best guess.)
It's kind of fascinating to watch when you can clearly tell the word went out from the upper tiers of the hive to start using a specific word or phrase. I'd love to have some way to watch the email lists and group chats where they gestate these things.
Revolver is good shit. I know it's like one guy's blog, but I like that guy apparently.
What's "Nazi Chop" that everyone in the article's comments are yammering about?
I'm curious, too, but I think they're just talking about a notorious user on their forum. From context.
God, shut the fuck up about this non-issue.
I guess some people downvote imp no matter what he says
What I said goes for both sides. Lesbians are whiny fucks who will say the most evil shit to men and then cry that they were "too scared" to say no to trannies. Trannies pushing this just sound rapey.
Both sides are just embarrassing themselves.
Have trannies considered it's not that they have a dick but that they're revolting as women?
There, you're not downvoted any more.