Whites and blacks are the same species. Comparing Whites to blacks is like comparing Great Danes to pugs. Different sub species.
Edit: Modern humans are, in fact, hominids.
30% of the sub-Saharan genome can't be identified because they were breeding with another, yet to be identified, species for millions of years. This is a scientific fact. I'm sorry you took "mountain gorillas" literally, I'll be sure to take your crippling autism into account in the future; baboons, denisovans, australopithecus, homo erectus, etc. They don't know species it was, but it wasn't homo sapiens.
Yes, Humans are hominids. So are Homo Erectus, which is a separate species that can't interbreed with Homo Sapiens. Both are hominids. You are asserting that blacks fall into a completely different species by claiming they are a lesser hominid, because that would place them... actually below Homo Erectus since Homo Erectus is one of the more highly developed hominid species.
You can't be trusted to talk about your "scientific facts" when you aren't using words correctly, and you're surprised when someone takes you seriously when you start talking about hominids and mountain gorillias, when you don't know anything about either of these things.
You can call me autistic, but all you are is an idiot racist spouting some bullshit pseudo-science you picked up from some racist internet shithole. You aren't the first white nationalist that's come here, they're just more coherent than you.
And I wouldn't talk too much shit about interbreeding with other hominid species as a white supremacist when we know for a fact that Homo Sapiens in Europe absolutely exchanged genetic material with Neandertals. At one point in Earth's history, there were actually several highly developed hominid species living on the planet at the same time with Homo Sapiens, and our species bred with probably all of them, and it wasn't excluding, or exclusive to, Europeans.
I'm sorry I don't know the entire hominid family tree and which sub-human species we could breed with. The Africans' ancestors fucked something closer to a monkey than we are enough times that it altered their entire genome.
I'm autistic too, that's why I try to find answers to questions like why it seems like every single black majority area on the planet is a violent, 3rd world shit hole.
You can look this stuff up yourself, but here's a primer
retarded bullshit cope about Europeans mating with Neanderthals
While that's true, we've built civilizations, and cities, and space stations. Obviously they did it enough to alter their evolutionary progress and overall intelligence.
I love White people and White culture, and notice that black company and black culture isn't as desirable. I'm sorry that for members of your rabbinical order is so offended by that. I encourage you to kvetch harder about White people being proud of their heritage and preferring their own kind (just like every other race on the planet is allowed to do), and I also look forward to your thesis-length explanation on why you love blacks so much more than Whites.
I'm autistic too, that's why I try to find answers to questions like why it seems like every single black majority area on the planet is a violent, 3rd world shit hole.
I've literally gone out of my way to look up upper class, black neighborhoods, that were 85% Black and had far below the average crime rate. You're not autistic, you're just following an ideological narrative and never challenging it.
That's why you are trying to blame African underdevelopment on cross-breeding (probably over 100,000 years ago) while rejecting geography, trade, culture, diet, predators, and Pan-African Socialism's dominance in the post-colonial period.
It's why you don't even understand that your dismissal of the most well documented instance of Homo Sapien cross-breeding with a species that had an explicitly lower cognitive development (European Homo Sapiens) is evidence of just how skeptically you're looking at any information. Your assessment is entirely linear. You don't seem to understand that Arab and Asian civilizations developed first, then proceeded to stall, which is the point where Europe especially northern Europe, begins to develop past the other regions. You do not have an explanation why northern Europeans were using bone-based weapons and tools in the Iron Age, and while China, Japan, and Arabia had already developed centuries earlier, only for northern Europe to surpass the development of everyone after the fall of the Roman Empire, and the shutting down of the Silk Road by the Ottomans. That delayed development, and then explosion of development at a specific time, can't be laid at the feet of them interbreeding with Neanderthals. There must be other factors.
You have dismissed 100% of those factors in favor of your ideological narrative simplicity. Which is why you had to default to calling me a jew.
Whites and blacks are the same species. Comparing Whites to blacks is like comparing Great Danes to pugs. Different sub species.
Edit: Modern humans are, in fact, hominids.
30% of the sub-Saharan genome can't be identified because they were breeding with another, yet to be identified, species for millions of years. This is a scientific fact. I'm sorry you took "mountain gorillas" literally, I'll be sure to take your crippling autism into account in the future; baboons, denisovans, australopithecus, homo erectus, etc. They don't know species it was, but it wasn't homo sapiens.
Yes, Humans are hominids. So are Homo Erectus, which is a separate species that can't interbreed with Homo Sapiens. Both are hominids. You are asserting that blacks fall into a completely different species by claiming they are a lesser hominid, because that would place them... actually below Homo Erectus since Homo Erectus is one of the more highly developed hominid species.
You can't be trusted to talk about your "scientific facts" when you aren't using words correctly, and you're surprised when someone takes you seriously when you start talking about hominids and mountain gorillias, when you don't know anything about either of these things.
You can call me autistic, but all you are is an idiot racist spouting some bullshit pseudo-science you picked up from some racist internet shithole. You aren't the first white nationalist that's come here, they're just more coherent than you.
And I wouldn't talk too much shit about interbreeding with other hominid species as a white supremacist when we know for a fact that Homo Sapiens in Europe absolutely exchanged genetic material with Neandertals. At one point in Earth's history, there were actually several highly developed hominid species living on the planet at the same time with Homo Sapiens, and our species bred with probably all of them, and it wasn't excluding, or exclusive to, Europeans.
I'm sorry I don't know the entire hominid family tree and which sub-human species we could breed with. The Africans' ancestors fucked something closer to a monkey than we are enough times that it altered their entire genome.
I'm autistic too, that's why I try to find answers to questions like why it seems like every single black majority area on the planet is a violent, 3rd world shit hole.
You can look this stuff up yourself, but here's a primer
Probable hominid crossbreed
Evidence of Africans crossbreeding with unknown hominid
This study was like 4th down in the search results, linked to in an NPR article
While that's true, we've built civilizations, and cities, and space stations. Obviously they did it enough to alter their evolutionary progress and overall intelligence.
I love White people and White culture, and notice that black company and black culture isn't as desirable. I'm sorry that for members of your rabbinical order is so offended by that. I encourage you to kvetch harder about White people being proud of their heritage and preferring their own kind (just like every other race on the planet is allowed to do), and I also look forward to your thesis-length explanation on why you love blacks so much more than Whites.
I've literally gone out of my way to look up upper class, black neighborhoods, that were 85% Black and had far below the average crime rate. You're not autistic, you're just following an ideological narrative and never challenging it.
That's why you are trying to blame African underdevelopment on cross-breeding (probably over 100,000 years ago) while rejecting geography, trade, culture, diet, predators, and Pan-African Socialism's dominance in the post-colonial period.
It's why you don't even understand that your dismissal of the most well documented instance of Homo Sapien cross-breeding with a species that had an explicitly lower cognitive development (European Homo Sapiens) is evidence of just how skeptically you're looking at any information. Your assessment is entirely linear. You don't seem to understand that Arab and Asian civilizations developed first, then proceeded to stall, which is the point where Europe especially northern Europe, begins to develop past the other regions. You do not have an explanation why northern Europeans were using bone-based weapons and tools in the Iron Age, and while China, Japan, and Arabia had already developed centuries earlier, only for northern Europe to surpass the development of everyone after the fall of the Roman Empire, and the shutting down of the Silk Road by the Ottomans. That delayed development, and then explosion of development at a specific time, can't be laid at the feet of them interbreeding with Neanderthals. There must be other factors.
You have dismissed 100% of those factors in favor of your ideological narrative simplicity. Which is why you had to default to calling me a jew.